2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Immune Repertoires between Bactrian Camel's Conventional and Heavy-Chain Antibodies

Abstract: Compared to classical antibodies, camel heavy chain antibodies (HCAbs) are smaller in size due to lack of the light chain and the first constant domain of the heavy chain (CH1 region). The variable regions of HCAbs (VHHs) are more soluble and stable than that of conventional antibodies (VHs). Even with such simple structure, they are still functional in antigen binding. Although HCAbs have been extensively investigated over the past two decades, most efforts have been based upon low throughput sequence analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, its molecular weight is only ~ 15 kDa and it can penetrate the blood brain barrier. And it can be produced with low cost and high yield and stability in not only yeast, but bacteria as well [2,19]. Recently, the first nanobody drug, Caplacizumab, was approved by the European Commission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, its molecular weight is only ~ 15 kDa and it can penetrate the blood brain barrier. And it can be produced with low cost and high yield and stability in not only yeast, but bacteria as well [2,19]. Recently, the first nanobody drug, Caplacizumab, was approved by the European Commission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Most camelid V H H and V H genes 18 are homologous to human IGHV3-family genes (~75–90% identity) and encode distinctive solubilizing residues in FR2 (Phe/Tyr42, Glu49, Arg50 and Gly 52 using IMGT numbering; these positions map to the V H :V L interface in conventional antibodies), although functional V H Hs lacking this consensus have been isolated. 19,20 Some camelid V genes may ‘promiscuously’ recombine with both heavy chain-only and conventional antibody constant region genes. 19 V H H domains bear unusually long CDR3 loops in comparison with human and murine conventional antibodies, 21,22 probably reflecting increased non-templated nucleotide addition, although this may be a feature of only a subset of V H Hs; 21 in some V H Hs, the long CDR3 loop serves a dual purpose, folding over the former V L interface as well as interacting with cognate antigen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 V H H domains bear unusually long CDR3 loops in comparison with human and murine conventional antibodies, 21,22 probably reflecting increased non-templated nucleotide addition, although this may be a feature of only a subset of V H Hs; 21 in some V H Hs, the long CDR3 loop serves a dual purpose, folding over the former V L interface as well as interacting with cognate antigen. The rearranged V H H exon is thought to undergo elevated rates of somatic hypermutation of both CDRs and FRs ( e.g ., FR1-encoding sequences immediately flanking CDR1; 2325 FR2-encoding sequences which may play a role in structuring the CDR3 loop; 20,25 FR3-encoding sequences that form a β-turn which can make contact with antigen, sometimes called CDR4 24 ). V H Hs may also acquire somatic insertions and deletions at higher rates than conventional antibodies, 24 and may under some circumstances undergo secondary rearrangement events using a cryptic recombination signal sequence in FR3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lengths of V H H CDR3 are much longer than conventional VH from camel IgG. The median CDR3 length of V H H is 20 amino acids (similar with shark V NAR ), whereas median length for camel VH CDR3 is only 15 amino acids [32]. However, there is no comprehensive study on the cysteine numbers and locations in camel V H H sequences for comparison with shark V NAR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%