2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of GMDH neural network based on genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization in stable channel design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to address the issue of model bias faced by ANN, group method of data handling (GMDH), automatically synthesize network from the database of inputs and outputs. This process which is called self-organization of input models removes the user from specifying the network architecture in advance and hence removes biases in the model [22][23][24]. Reduced computational time is another advantage of the GMDH method as compared to the standard ANN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to address the issue of model bias faced by ANN, group method of data handling (GMDH), automatically synthesize network from the database of inputs and outputs. This process which is called self-organization of input models removes the user from specifying the network architecture in advance and hence removes biases in the model [22][23][24]. Reduced computational time is another advantage of the GMDH method as compared to the standard ANN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) can simulate water, sediment, and nutrient yield in a watershed by using input data from GIS and applying different agricultural practices, climate change, and land use (Bosch et al 2011;Makarewicz et al 2014;Schiefer et al 2013). Nowadays, the use of artificial intelligence methods as an approach to solving complex nonlinear prob-lems and lake level forecasting has increased (Myronidis et al 2012;Shafaei and Kisi 2016;Shaghaghi et al 2017;Shiri et al 2016;Wang et al 2009;Zaji et al 2018;Zeynoddin et al 2018). Another method of lake level fluctuation analysis and prediction is using data from long-term studies of ice phenology (Apsite et al 2014;Jensen et al 2007;Kostecki 2013;Nõges and Nõges 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, identification of the type of shape profile created on the banks like as specified channel geometric dimensions of stable channels is important. Concerning to the determination of slope, depth and water surface width in stable state or regime of channels, extensive research has been done (Lee and Julien 2006;Afzalimehr et al 2010;Métivier et al 2016;Gholami et al 2017a;Shaghaghi et al 2017;Joshi et al 2018). But there is little research to determine the type of bank profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the speed and performance of ANFIS models, using optimization algorithms (Hosseini et al 2016;Gholami et al 2017b;Bonakdari and Zaji 2018;Karaboga and Kaya 2018) and evolutionary models (multi-objective optimization) (Dariane and Azimi 2016; Ahmadianfar et al 2017;Saba et al 2017;Karkevandi-Talkhooncheh et al 2017;Nouiri 2017) has been very common. Regarding the use of AI methods in prediction of the stable channel geometry dimensions (width, depth and slope), it can be noted to Madvar et al (2011), Taher-Shamsi et al (2013, Bonakdari and Gholami (2016), Gholami et al (2017a), Shaghaghi et al (2017Shaghaghi et al ( , 2018a. All of them referred to high ability of AI models in prediction of stable channels geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%