2011
DOI: 10.1109/tnb.2011.2178262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Genomic Signal Processing for Microarray Data Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study show that the fractal approach provides the best clustering accuracy compared to other digital signal processing and well known statistical methods (Istepanian RS 2011 ).…”
Section: Genome Sequence Comparison With Practical Genomicmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The results of this study show that the fractal approach provides the best clustering accuracy compared to other digital signal processing and well known statistical methods (Istepanian RS 2011 ).…”
Section: Genome Sequence Comparison With Practical Genomicmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Specifically, increasing gene number allows our algorithm to more accurately identify the noise cluster, thus separating the gene cluster(s) of interest more precisely. While our simulation studies demonstrate that our approach is able to both capture meaningful signals from very noisy data and group them very well, we cannot compare our method with existing methods [ 36 ] simply because no information about time is contained in the clusters obtained by other methods.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them hierarchical clustering analysis using FCOM, a 'combination function' data reduction and cluster analysis software from Winlist (Verity House Software) is the most common method as it allows for an easy visual representation of the data 20 . This hierarchical clustering analysis algorithms are similar to the software tools used in a wide diversity of gene expression studies [21][22][23] . Cells analysed by polychromatic flow cytometry are divided into multiple subpopulations, the number of cells within each subphenotype is provided as a relative frequency of the total cell population of interest (Fig.…”
Section: Data Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%