2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of gene sequence of goat CSN1S1 F and N alleles and characterization of CSN1S1 transcript variants in mammary gland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 2 can be observed genotypes after XmnI digestion of fragments obtained by the XmnI PCR-RFLP method according to Ramunno et al (2000). This technique allowed us to identify F and N alleles, but not distinguish alleles A from G, H, I, O 1 , O 2 on the haplotype associated to 63 and 150 bp fragments, neither alleles B from B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , B 4 , C, E, L on the haplotype associated to 63 and 161 bp fragments (Ramunno et al 2005;Cosenza et al 2008). …”
Section: E F and N Allele Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 2 can be observed genotypes after XmnI digestion of fragments obtained by the XmnI PCR-RFLP method according to Ramunno et al (2000). This technique allowed us to identify F and N alleles, but not distinguish alleles A from G, H, I, O 1 , O 2 on the haplotype associated to 63 and 150 bp fragments, neither alleles B from B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , B 4 , C, E, L on the haplotype associated to 63 and 161 bp fragments (Ramunno et al 2005;Cosenza et al 2008). …”
Section: E F and N Allele Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alleles of the CSN1S1 locus in goats have been grouped in 4 levels according to their individual approximate contribution to quantity of protein in milk; strong alleles (A, B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , B 4 , C, H, L and M), intermediate alleles (E and I), weak alleles (D, F and G), and null alleles (O 1 , O 2 and N) (Grosclaude et al 1987;Moioli et al 1998;Rando et al 2000;Bevilacqua et al 2002;Ramunno et al 2005;Sacchi et al 2005;Sztankóová et al 2007). In dairy goat populations, it is often considered convenient to identify the CSN1S1 genotypes of individual animals, with the idea of incorporating this information to the selection processes, and therefore propitiate an increase on the rate of genetic gain for casein contents and yield through gene assisted selection (GAS), compared to selection programs based only on phenotypic and pedigree information (BLUP), (Grosclaude et al 1987;Moioli et al 1998;Dekkers, 2004;Sánchez et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The caprine LALBA gene has been less frequently studied than the goat casein genes and their polymorphisms due to limited economic interests [8][9][10][11]. Initial reports regarding various LALBA forms emerged in the Italian population [11] and later, in Chinese breeds, different variants were analysed for influence on milk and body size traits [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen α s1 -casein variants associated with high α s1 -casein content (3.6 g·L -1 per allele; A, B1, B2, B3, B4, C, L and M or 4.2 g·L -1 per allele, H) or medium (1.6 g·L -1 per allele; E and I) or low (0.6 g·L -1 per allele; D, F and G) or no α s1 -casein (O 1 , O 2 and N) have been so far reported [4,28,42]. An additional source of α s1 -casein polymorphism is the simultaneous existence of deleted forms due to alternative splicing [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%