2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of GALLEX and GNO solar neutrino data

Abstract: Since the GALLEX and GNO datasets were derived from closely related experiments, there is a natural tendency to merge them. This is perhaps appropriate for any analysis based on the hypothesis that the solar neutrino flux is constant, but it is not necessarily appropriate for an analysis that allows for possible variability, since the GALLEX and GNO experiments belong to different solar cycles. Moreover, we find significant differences between the GALLEX and GNO datasets. It appears, from inspection of the tim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have taken data from the tables in these articles, except that, for run 42, we adopt for the lower error estimate the value 50 shown in Figure 1 of Hampel et al (1999), rather than the earlier zero value in Table 3 of Hampel et al (1996). Since there are important differences between GALLEX and GNO data [for instance, there is a 5-sigma difference in the error estimates (Sturrock, Caldwell, and Scargle 2006)], we analyze these two datasets separately.…”
Section: Gallex and Gno Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have taken data from the tables in these articles, except that, for run 42, we adopt for the lower error estimate the value 50 shown in Figure 1 of Hampel et al (1999), rather than the earlier zero value in Table 3 of Hampel et al (1996). Since there are important differences between GALLEX and GNO data [for instance, there is a 5-sigma difference in the error estimates (Sturrock, Caldwell, and Scargle 2006)], we analyze these two datasets separately.…”
Section: Gallex and Gno Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence evidence for bimodality may be construed as evidence for variability. A possible source of such variability would be rotational modulation, for which we have found evidence in power-spectrum analyses (Sturrock, Caldwell, and Scargle, 2006). It is therefore interesting to compare the power spectra formed from GALLEX runs 1 to 42 and GALLEX runs 42 to 65.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To form spectrograms, we first prepare the data by means of the RONO (Rank-Order NOrmalization) operation (Sturrock et al, 2011a) that maps the measurements onto a normal distribution, as is appropriate for power-spectrum analyses such as the Lomb-Scargle procedure (Lomb, 1976;Scargle, 1982) or a likelihood procedure (Sturrock et al, 2006). We then carry out a sequence of likelihood power-spectrum analyses of sections of the data.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ptb Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the magnetic field at disk center may have roots deep in the convection zone, and possibly removed from the equatorial section. Hence it is worth noting that the synodic rotation rate in an equatorial section of the convection zone covers the range 13.1−13.9 yr −1 , and the synodic rotation rate at latitude 25 o is lower by about 0.3yr −1 (Schou, Christensen-Dalsgaard, and Thompson, 1992 corresponding to the range of synodic rotation rate in a complete equatorial section solar interior (Sturrock, Caldwell, and Scargle, 2006).…”
Section: Power-spectrum Of the Photospheric Magnetic Field For The Ovmentioning
confidence: 99%