2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02179-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of EpCAM high-expressing and low-expressing circulating tumour cells with regard to their clonal relationship and clinical value

Abstract: Background Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are mainly enriched based on the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). Although it was shown that an EpCAM low-expressing CTC fraction is not captured by such approaches, knowledge about its prognostic and predictive relevance and its relation to EpCAM-positive CTCs is lacking. Methods We developed an immunomagnetic assay to enrich CTCs from metastatic breast cancer patients EpCAM independently using antibodi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this precise performance of ZeptoCTC, we argue that the observed signal variabilities observed between single cells – also of the same cell line – are pointing toward well-known cell-to-cell heterogeneity, a phenomenon that has been previously noted in other single cell experiments (4345). For instance, EpCAM expression levels in two MCF7 cells were highly different, matching observations we have made previously suggesting a continuum of EpCAM-positivity in MCF-7 cells (46). Similarly, varying levels of Akt and pAkt in single MCF7 cells treated with Capivasertib suggest diverse drug responses within individual cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Due to this precise performance of ZeptoCTC, we argue that the observed signal variabilities observed between single cells – also of the same cell line – are pointing toward well-known cell-to-cell heterogeneity, a phenomenon that has been previously noted in other single cell experiments (4345). For instance, EpCAM expression levels in two MCF7 cells were highly different, matching observations we have made previously suggesting a continuum of EpCAM-positivity in MCF-7 cells (46). Similarly, varying levels of Akt and pAkt in single MCF7 cells treated with Capivasertib suggest diverse drug responses within individual cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Genes were ranked using HR (Figure S5). Notably, the epithelial marker, EPCAM, was not a high-ranking prognosticator in this cohort, yet CTCs expressing EPCAM are known to be prognostically relevant in various malignancies [7,19]. Instead, genes involved in AR signaling (KLK3, HOXB13, and GRHL2), and metastasis (MYO6 and TRPM8) were more informative [20,21].…”
Section: Prognostic Value Of Ctc Profilingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, the protein nanoparticles would tolerantly select for antigens and specific DNA aptamers that target tumor cells. In fact, the antigenic complexity and heterogeneity of CTCs lead to poor detection and capture of CTCs by a specific antibody, such as EpCAM. Protein nanoparticles have a potential for detecting a variety of CTCs with different phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%