1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00121822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of DNA sequence organization in the vertebrate genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that many of the repetitive sequences of the chicken genome are conserved as they were found in the genome of such a distant species as the ostrich, although their amount is considerably lower (Eden et al 1978). On the whole, in chicken DNA unique sequences are interspersed with long repetitive sequences and the genome organization is closer to that of Drosophila and some other insects than to the Xenopus-type genome organization of most vertebrates (Shields and Straus 1978;Epplen et al 1978;Ginatulin et al 1979).…”
Section: B Chromosome Banding Patterns and Dna In Reptiles And Birdsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting that many of the repetitive sequences of the chicken genome are conserved as they were found in the genome of such a distant species as the ostrich, although their amount is considerably lower (Eden et al 1978). On the whole, in chicken DNA unique sequences are interspersed with long repetitive sequences and the genome organization is closer to that of Drosophila and some other insects than to the Xenopus-type genome organization of most vertebrates (Shields and Straus 1978;Epplen et al 1978;Ginatulin et al 1979).…”
Section: B Chromosome Banding Patterns and Dna In Reptiles And Birdsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Now it has become evident that no such clear-cut universalization exists. For example, genome organization in many birds is apparently quite different (Arthur and Straus 1978;Epplen et al 1978;Ginatulin et al 1979), for more on which see below. Moreover, recent data on the repetitive sequence arrangement in amphibians does not quite agree with the results of the pioneer works.…”
Section: B Genome Organization In Amphibiansmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In their genomes in addition to the two types mentioned, other types were found. In the genomes of the fungus Achlya (Hudspeth et al, 1977) and the albatross Diomedea epomophora (Ginatulin & Ginatulina, 1979;Ginatulin et al, 1980) a considerable part of the genome (more than 70-80%) consists of single-cop3' sequences more than 10 kb long, not interspersed with repetitions. Thus, one must acknowledge that uniformity ofgenome arrangement as postulated in the first papers Galau et aL, 1976) is not a rule in eukaryotes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%