2014
DOI: 10.3103/s0003701x14010137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of diffused solar radiation models for optimum tilt angle determination for Indian locations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model estimates fraction of diffuse component which is usually circumsolar and assumes it to be in the same direction as beam radiation. HD is given by the relation '' (15),'' where ''H O '' monthly average daily extraterrestrial radiation.…”
Section: B Total Solar Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model estimates fraction of diffuse component which is usually circumsolar and assumes it to be in the same direction as beam radiation. HD is given by the relation '' (15),'' where ''H O '' monthly average daily extraterrestrial radiation.…”
Section: B Total Solar Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While determining the optimum tilt angle for Canada, Hailu and Fung [14] concluded that the isotropic model gave lower tilt angle estimates relative to the latitude of the location, compared with slightly higher tilt angle estimates for the anisotropic model. Similarly, the anisotropic model achieved a higher tilt angle for various locations in India [15]. Shukla et al [16] performed another study in India using three isotropic and three anisotropic models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The tilt angle (TA) has an impact on dust deposition on PVs, and the TA and tracking system work together to maximize incidence SR on PV surfaces [7,8]. In the literature, incident SR on a horizontal surface for Indian cities is presented [9,10] however, it is restricted to inclined surfaces [11][12][13][14]. Under various tracking settings, Fahl et al [15] calculated OPTA for Bangalore as 12.96 for Bangalore, India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy yield at yearly, seasonally and monthly optimum tilt angle are found to be 25%, 28%, and 29% more in comparison to fixed tilt (25°) angle of the plant. Yadav and Chandel [9] analyzed different diffuse SR model for calculation of OPTA for Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh (H.P.) and found that Liu and Jordan model give *For correspondence better result with 4.512% error between calculated and measured optimum tilt angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%