2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of closed-form expressions and other commonly used seakeeping methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Frequency Independent Model Error (FIME) of VWBM calculated by CFE was determined by the regression equation proposed in [25]. It was found to be 1.19 for test oil tankers from Table 2.…”
Section: Results Of the Regression Analysis Are Presented In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Frequency Independent Model Error (FIME) of VWBM calculated by CFE was determined by the regression equation proposed in [25]. It was found to be 1.19 for test oil tankers from Table 2.…”
Section: Results Of the Regression Analysis Are Presented In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found to be 1.19 for test oil tankers from Table 2. The regression equation developed in [25] was based on the extensive comparison of CFE with experiments and other commonly used seakeeping methods. Using data from that same study, FIME for the 3D panel method was found to be 0.98 using corresponding regression coefficients.…”
Section: Results Of the Regression Analysis Are Presented In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation