2023
DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13040049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aid Users and Non-Users: An Investigative Study

Satofumi Sugimoto,
Tadao Yoshida,
Yukari Fukunaga
et al.

Abstract: Clinical findings on cartilage conduction hearing aids (CCHAs) have gradually become clear; however, few reports include a large number of cases. This study included 91 ears from 69 patients who underwent CCHA fitting in our hospital. Their ears were divided into six groups (i.e., bilateral aural atresia or severe canal stenosis, unilateral aural atresia or severe canal stenosis, chronic otitis media or chronic otitis externa with otorrhea, sensorineural hearing loss, mixed hearing loss, and conductive hearing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional AC-HAs and BC-HAs are effective strategies; however, the former device is not suitable for patients with aural atresia and chronic otitis media, and the latter has esthetic disadvantages because of the requirement of headbands or headsets, causing hesitation in individuals and parents. The small and lightweight CC-HA has minimal resistance and excellent effectiveness, thereby reducing psychological resistance [26]. As a result, CC-HAs are being considered as an alternative to conventional bone-anchored HAs, vibrant sound bridges (VSBs), and cochlear implants, and are frequently used during the pre-surgery stage [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional AC-HAs and BC-HAs are effective strategies; however, the former device is not suitable for patients with aural atresia and chronic otitis media, and the latter has esthetic disadvantages because of the requirement of headbands or headsets, causing hesitation in individuals and parents. The small and lightweight CC-HA has minimal resistance and excellent effectiveness, thereby reducing psychological resistance [26]. As a result, CC-HAs are being considered as an alternative to conventional bone-anchored HAs, vibrant sound bridges (VSBs), and cochlear implants, and are frequently used during the pre-surgery stage [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%