1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1999)11:1<31::aid-ajhb3>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of age prediction by markers of bone change in the hand assessed by roentgenography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, one may find in anthropological literature numerous works dealing with the estimation of bone loss based on the examination of the metacarpus. In their studies, particular researchers focused on the following issues: development of the metacarpus (Wolań ski, 1967;Bonnard, 1968;Himes et al, 1975;Kimura, 1978;Becker, 1984;Plato et al, 1984), estimation of the stature based on the measurements of metacarpals in children and adult individuals (Musgrave & Harneja, 1978;Kimura, 1992), estimation of age at death Karasik et al, 1999), effect of climatic conditions on radiomorphometric characteristics of the metacarpus Belkin et al, 1998), methodology of radiometric examination, with particular attention paid to variability and correlations between particular metacarpals and phalanxes (Anderson et al, 1966;Chumlea et al, 1984;Kušec et al, 1990;Garn, 1991;Lazenby, 1995), research, including comparative analyses on the nature and intensity of bone tissue involution (Smith & Rizek, 1966;Spencer et al, 1966;Morgan et al, 1967;Plato & Norris, 1980;Plato et al, 1982;Kušec et al, 1988;Kušec, 1989;Mišigoj-Duraković, 1992).…”
Section: Bone Tissue Involution In Skeletal Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, one may find in anthropological literature numerous works dealing with the estimation of bone loss based on the examination of the metacarpus. In their studies, particular researchers focused on the following issues: development of the metacarpus (Wolań ski, 1967;Bonnard, 1968;Himes et al, 1975;Kimura, 1978;Becker, 1984;Plato et al, 1984), estimation of the stature based on the measurements of metacarpals in children and adult individuals (Musgrave & Harneja, 1978;Kimura, 1992), estimation of age at death Karasik et al, 1999), effect of climatic conditions on radiomorphometric characteristics of the metacarpus Belkin et al, 1998), methodology of radiometric examination, with particular attention paid to variability and correlations between particular metacarpals and phalanxes (Anderson et al, 1966;Chumlea et al, 1984;Kušec et al, 1990;Garn, 1991;Lazenby, 1995), research, including comparative analyses on the nature and intensity of bone tissue involution (Smith & Rizek, 1966;Spencer et al, 1966;Morgan et al, 1967;Plato & Norris, 1980;Plato et al, 1982;Kušec et al, 1988;Kušec, 1989;Mišigoj-Duraković, 1992).…”
Section: Bone Tissue Involution In Skeletal Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographic cortical bone thickness is a well-recognized valuable method for assessing bone biology, and has long been used as a measure of skeletal mass [4,10,12,15,16,29,30,39,40,42]. Cortical thickness is measured as the amount of bone tissue present between the periosteal and endosteal surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model proved to be the most parsimonious and best fitting. The logistic model of OSS on age was found to be the most predictive in several other modern populations (Karasik et al, 1999). The curves of bone changes related to age, as measured by OSS, are nearly identical in males and females (Kobyliansky et al, 1995(Kobyliansky et al, , 1996.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hand roentgenography provides several types of age assessment, including osteometric measurements (OSM; i.e., measures of length and breadth of bones and their cortical thickness), and osteographic scores (OSS), or descriptive criteria of bone age (Kobyliansky et al, 1995). Roentgenographic skeletal measurements of age at death are easy enough to perform, relatively inexpensive within large samples, and highly reliable (Kobyliansky et al, 1995(Kobyliansky et al, , 1996Karasik et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%