2022
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27248964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex Using an Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Multivariate Statistical Analysis

Abstract: Chinese Herbal Medicines (CHMs) can be identified by experts according to their odors. However, the identification of these medicines is subjective and requires long-term experience. The samples of Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex used were dried cortexes, which are often confused in the market due to their similar appearance, but their chemical composition and odor are different. The clinical use of the two herbs is different, but the phenomenon of being confused with each other often occurs. There… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate variable importance in projection (VIP) values, calculated in the OPLS-DA model, was employed to identify variables contributing to class separation. With VIP values exceeding 1 as the criterion (Sun et al, 2022), Figure 3f revealed 16 compounds as differential markers between the two sample types.…”
Section: Volatile Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate variable importance in projection (VIP) values, calculated in the OPLS-DA model, was employed to identify variables contributing to class separation. With VIP values exceeding 1 as the criterion (Sun et al, 2022), Figure 3f revealed 16 compounds as differential markers between the two sample types.…”
Section: Volatile Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A, B, and C in Figure 5 represent the results of fast GC e-nose analysis, HS-GC-IMS analysis, and HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis, respectively. R 2 X and Q 2 could evaluate the explanatory and predictive abilities of the models; the closer R 2 X and Q 2 were to 1, the better the fitness of the model was [25]. The model parameters of fast GC e-nose analysis (R 2 X = 0.922 and Q 2 = 0.780) show that 92.2% and 78.0% of the total variation could be explained and predicted, respectively.…”
Section: Comprehensive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%