Comparative Analysis of a Floating Mooring Line-Driven Platform (FMDP) Having Different Mooring Lines Patterns

Horoub, Mamon M.; Khan, Sikandar; Ali, Sajid; Horoub, Ayman M.A.

doi:10.1109/icmae.2018.8467658

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, the application of artificial intelligence came into use. The term “artificial intelligence” (AI) refers to the widespread application of computer programming techniques to solve complex engineering issues, particularly those involving regression and classification [ 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. AI models are not only trained by using a large number of experimental observations but also validated using a new dataset [ 44 , 54 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Hybrid SVR-Based Prediction Model for the Interfacial Bond Strength of Externally Bonded FRP Laminates on Grooves with Concrete Prisms

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current work presents a comparative study of hybrid models that use support vector machines (SVMs) and meta-heuristic optimization algorithms (MOAs) to predict the ultimate interfacial bond strength (IBS) capacity of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP). More precisely, a dataset containing 136 experimental tests was first collected from the available literature for the development of hybrid SVM models. Five MOAs, namely the particle swarm optimization, the grey wolf optimizer, the equilibrium optimizer, the Harris hawks optimization and the slime mold algorithm, were used; five hybrid SVMs were constructed. The performance of the developed SVMs was then evaluated. The accuracy of the constructed hybrid models was found to be on the higher side, with R2 ranges between 0.8870 and 0.9774 in the training phase and between 0.8270 and 0.9294 in the testing phase. Based on the experimental results, the developed SVM–HHO (a hybrid model that uses an SVM and the Harris hawks optimization) was overall the most accurate model, with R2 values of 0.9241 and 0.9241 in the training and testing phases, respectively. Experimental results also demonstrate that the developed hybrid SVM can be used as an alternate tool for estimating the ultimate IBS capacity of FRP concrete in civil engineering projects.

show abstract