2013
DOI: 10.1177/0300060512474773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of a complement fixation assay and enzyme immunoassay to determine the seroprevalence of measles and varicella in a survey of healthcare workers

Abstract: Differences between the CF assay and EIA in detecting seronegative or seropositive healthcare workers for measles and varicella suggest that undertaking a seroprevalence survey using an EIA, rather than a CF assay, would more accurately determine susceptibility to vaccine-preventable diseases, in healthcare settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39,40 Among commercially available test methodologies to detect IgG, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is the most sensitive. 41,42 Although IgG provides reasonable, if imperfect, evidence of immunity, postvaccination serologic surveillance is not recommended.…”
Section: Hepatitis B Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 Among commercially available test methodologies to detect IgG, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is the most sensitive. 41,42 Although IgG provides reasonable, if imperfect, evidence of immunity, postvaccination serologic surveillance is not recommended.…”
Section: Hepatitis B Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%