2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene and Metagenome Sequencing in Pediatric Gut Microbiomes

Abstract: The colonization of the human gut microbiome begins at birth, and over time, these microbial communities become increasingly complex. Most of what we currently know about the human microbiome, especially in early stages of development, was described using culture-independent sequencing methods that allow us to identify the taxonomic composition of microbial communities using genomic techniques, such as amplicon or shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Each method has distinct tradeoffs, but there has not been a dire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(90 reference statements)
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we assessed how pseudo- nifH sequences in public databases affect metagenomic analyses of environmental samples. We focused on reusable metagenomic data sets in NCBI SRA/EMBL-EBI ERA/DDBJ DRA ( 51 ) under the following environmental categories: “activated sludge metagenome,” “human gut metagenome,” “termite metagenome,” “wastewater metagenome,” and “∗ sediment metagenome” ( 52 64 , 72 ). We randomly picked SRA/ERA/DRA accession numbers that satisfy the following criteria: (i) sequenced on Illumina MiSeq, HiSeq, MiniSeq, NextSeq, or NovaSeq (i.e., not subject to frameshifting read errors by Roche 454); (ii) labeled as a “WGS” (standing for whole-genome shotgun) project; and (iii) described in a peer-reviewed literature (i.e., likely to be technically sound).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we assessed how pseudo- nifH sequences in public databases affect metagenomic analyses of environmental samples. We focused on reusable metagenomic data sets in NCBI SRA/EMBL-EBI ERA/DDBJ DRA ( 51 ) under the following environmental categories: “activated sludge metagenome,” “human gut metagenome,” “termite metagenome,” “wastewater metagenome,” and “∗ sediment metagenome” ( 52 64 , 72 ). We randomly picked SRA/ERA/DRA accession numbers that satisfy the following criteria: (i) sequenced on Illumina MiSeq, HiSeq, MiniSeq, NextSeq, or NovaSeq (i.e., not subject to frameshifting read errors by Roche 454); (ii) labeled as a “WGS” (standing for whole-genome shotgun) project; and (iii) described in a peer-reviewed literature (i.e., likely to be technically sound).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these are powerful and valuable tools, they have limitations. For example, profiling gut microbiomes by both 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing techniques demonstrated several genera that are missed or underrepresented by each profiling method separately [270].…”
Section: False Negativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Microbiome.jl and BiobakeryUtils.jl are already functional and being used for research (Lewis et al, 2021;Peterson et al, 2021;Tso et al, 2021), there are several avenues for further development.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%