2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-010-2669-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis between laparoscopic (UCL) and open (UCO) technique for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients

Abstract: Of the 165 patients with UC in our hospital, 32 underwent surgery. The laparoscopic approach seems feasible and safe. A single staged approach (Group 1 + Group 2) remains the most reasonable choice for most patients. One-step approach was done only in selected cases (Group 3). The advantages of laparoscopy, such as improved cosmetic aspects, shorter postoperative ileus and hospital stay, were observed in the laparoscopic colectomy, proctectomy and ileoanal pouch in our study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the course of the study, however, surgical times for laparoscopic procedures improved significantly and were comparable to those of open surgery. 13 This was not the patient in the largest reported series (n = 136), in which no reduction in laparoscopic operating times was observed (median time 258 minutes). 2 Linden et al reported longer operating times with a laparoscopic approach (median time 517 minutes vs 430 minutes), 14 whereas in one series no significant difference in operating time was identified between laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomies (mean total operating time of 443 vs 403 minutes, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Over the course of the study, however, surgical times for laparoscopic procedures improved significantly and were comparable to those of open surgery. 13 This was not the patient in the largest reported series (n = 136), in which no reduction in laparoscopic operating times was observed (median time 258 minutes). 2 Linden et al reported longer operating times with a laparoscopic approach (median time 517 minutes vs 430 minutes), 14 whereas in one series no significant difference in operating time was identified between laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomies (mean total operating time of 443 vs 403 minutes, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A similar conversion rate was reported by Courtney et al (6.7%). 3 Even though 0% conversion rates have also been reported, 7 , 13 , 15 a rate around 7% is considered acceptable and seems comparable with the adult population (7.9%). 10 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations