2018
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bby107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis and prediction of quorum-sensing peptides using feature representation learning and machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 5, we can observe that QSPpred-FL yields the highest prediction performance of 94.30% Ac and 0.885 MCC over 10-fold CV, while our proposed model iQSP gave a 91.07 ± 1.77% Ac and 0.82 ± 0.04 MCC. On the other hand, based on the independent validation test, iQSP outperformed that other methods with 93.00 ± 1.97% Ac, 0.86 ± 0.04 MCC and 0.96 ± 0.02 auROC, which was better than the existing QSP predictors [28,29,48]. Although, iQSP achieved slightly better than QSPpred-FL, our proposed model showed significant improvement than QSPpred-FL considering the two objectives: using the less complexity of prediction methods (1 SVM vs. 99 RFs) and a minimum number of features used (18D vs. 913D).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From Table 5, we can observe that QSPpred-FL yields the highest prediction performance of 94.30% Ac and 0.885 MCC over 10-fold CV, while our proposed model iQSP gave a 91.07 ± 1.77% Ac and 0.82 ± 0.04 MCC. On the other hand, based on the independent validation test, iQSP outperformed that other methods with 93.00 ± 1.97% Ac, 0.86 ± 0.04 MCC and 0.96 ± 0.02 auROC, which was better than the existing QSP predictors [28,29,48]. Although, iQSP achieved slightly better than QSPpred-FL, our proposed model showed significant improvement than QSPpred-FL considering the two objectives: using the less complexity of prediction methods (1 SVM vs. 99 RFs) and a minimum number of features used (18D vs. 913D).…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To demonstrate the effectiveness and power of our method, we conducted a comparative study of our final model (named iQSP) with the existing methods. To date, there are only two existings methods developed for the prediction of QSPs, i.e., QSPpred [29] and QSPpred-FL [28,48], performing on the benchmark and independent datasets over 10-fold CV and independent validation test. Table 5 lists the preformance comparisons of iQSP and the existing methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 188-bit (Wei et al, 2018) and Izlti (Diener et al, 2016) feature extraction algorithms are combined with the SVM classifier to generate the 188D_SVM and Iztli_SVM, respectively. The comparison of the PSBP-SVM with the 188D_SVM and Iztli_SVM is illustrated in Figure 2A.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Identifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%