2019
DOI: 10.1101/524868
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analyses of chromatin landscape in white adipose tissue suggest humans may have less beigeing potential than other primates

Abstract: Humans carry a much larger percentage of body fat than other primates. Despite the central role of adipose tissue in metabolism, little is known about the evolution of white adipose tissue in primates. Phenotypic divergence is often caused by genetic divergence in cis-regulatory regions. We examined the cis-regulatory landscape of fat during human origins by performing comparative analyses of chromatin accessibility in human and chimpanzee adipose tissue using macaque as an outgroup. We find that many cis-regu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swain- Lenz et al (2019) performed comparative analyses of the adipose chromatin landscape in humans, chimpanzees, and rhesus macaques, concluding that their findings reflect differences in the adapted diets of humans and chimpanzees. They (p. 2004) write:…”
Section: Genetic and Metabolic Adaptation To High-fat Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Swain- Lenz et al (2019) performed comparative analyses of the adipose chromatin landscape in humans, chimpanzees, and rhesus macaques, concluding that their findings reflect differences in the adapted diets of humans and chimpanzees. They (p. 2004) write:…”
Section: Genetic and Metabolic Adaptation To High-fat Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swain‐Lenz et al (2019) performed comparative analyses of the adipose chromatin landscape in humans, chimpanzees, and rhesus macaques, concluding that their findings reflect differences in the adapted diets of humans and chimpanzees. They (p. 2004) write: “Taken together, these results suggest that humans shut down regions of the genome to accommodate a high‐fat diet while chimpanzees open regions of the genome to accommodate a high sugar diet.”…”
Section: Physiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While gene expression divergence has been extensively characterized in mammalian tissues (Brawand et al, 2011;Cardoso-Moreira et al, 2019), the evolution of the associated regulatory regions is not well understood. Enhancer and promoter evolution has mostly been studied by comparing one mammalian tissue or cell type across several species (Danko et al, 2018;Glinsky and Barakat, 2019;Swain-Lenz et al, 2019;Villar et al, 2015). This approach is unable to compare evolutionary trends across tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate metabolic phenotypic differences among mammals with human lineage-specific acceleration of fat-associated endurance. To assess lineage-specific molecular signatures between humans and primates, we compared transcriptomic and epigenomic data from organs with high fat content such as brain and adipose tissue (26,27), followed by functional annotation in tissue-specific networks (28). Consistent with phenotypic data, homo sapiens displayed enhanced transcriptional regulatory mechanisms and decreased lipid degradation (Fig.…”
Section: Phenotypic and Molecular Adaptations Reveal Metabolic Human Acceleration Domainsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…(C) Network-derived discovery of biological processes (28) in human enriched gene sets from tissues with high-fat content. Data derived from differential expression by RNAseq and ATACseq comparing human and primate tissues (26,27). (D) Network-based node prioritization of recomposed interacting transcriptional regulators binding to HAR-associated genes.…”
Section: Phenotypic and Molecular Adaptations Reveal Metabolic Human Acceleration Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%