2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnd.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparaison de la classification de recettes par trois systèmes de profilage nutritionnel : SAIN, LIM, SENS et 5-C

Abstract: In response to the inclusion in the French Act on the modernization of the health system of a principle of a simplified nutrition labelling system, two nutrient profiling systems have been developed to classify foods according to their nutritional composition: the 5-colour labelling system (5-C), recently adopted by the French Ministry of Health and the French Simplified Nutritional Labelling System (SENS), adapted from the SAIN,LIM, developed by the ANSES. The aim of this study was to compare rankings yielded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, total Nutri-Score was highly correlated with LIM (r s = 0.69, p < 0.001) and less correlated with SAIN (r s = −0.58, p < 0.001). These figures corroborate the results (κ = 0.45, r s = 0.78 for LIM and r s = −0.42 for SAIN) obtained in a previous study comparing SAIN,LIM and 5-C (former name of the Nutri-Score, of which the algorithm has since been slightly modified) nutrient profiling systems [ 51 ]. The SAIN,LIM system can be represented graphically (LIM on the x -axis and SAIN on the y -axis), thus allowing the display of the nutritional positions of the products:
Figure A1 Projection of non-vegetarian and vegetarian main dishes ( n = 984) on the SAIN,LIM plane, represented with the colours of their class according to the Nutri-Score.
…”
Section: Table A1supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, total Nutri-Score was highly correlated with LIM (r s = 0.69, p < 0.001) and less correlated with SAIN (r s = −0.58, p < 0.001). These figures corroborate the results (κ = 0.45, r s = 0.78 for LIM and r s = −0.42 for SAIN) obtained in a previous study comparing SAIN,LIM and 5-C (former name of the Nutri-Score, of which the algorithm has since been slightly modified) nutrient profiling systems [ 51 ]. The SAIN,LIM system can be represented graphically (LIM on the x -axis and SAIN on the y -axis), thus allowing the display of the nutritional positions of the products:
Figure A1 Projection of non-vegetarian and vegetarian main dishes ( n = 984) on the SAIN,LIM plane, represented with the colours of their class according to the Nutri-Score.
…”
Section: Table A1supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, total Nutri-Score was highly correlated with LIM (r s = 0.69, p < 0.001) and less correlated with SAIN (r s = −0.58, p < 0.001). These figures corroborate the results (κ = 0.45, r s = 0.78 for LIM and r s = −0.42 for SAIN) obtained in a previous study comparing SAIN,LIM and 5-C (former name of the Nutri-Score, of which the algorithm has since been slightly modified) nutrient profiling systems [ 51 ].…”
Section: Table A1supporting
confidence: 89%
“…One challenge of nutrient profiling is to adequately weight the respective contributions of positive and negative components. Some existing systems appear to be mainly driven by energy density and nutrients ( 33 , 34 ). In this study, we tested four alternative weighting models for the BQS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%