2015
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0367.2015v36n1suplp233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação do sistema de identificação automatizado Vitek 2 e PCR-ITS para caracterização das espécies dos isolados clínicos de Candida spp.

Abstract: DOI: 10.5433/1679 As infecções graves causadas pelo gênero Candida têm se tornado um desafio na questão diagnóstica, no intuito de se detectar e identificar o agente etiológico de forma ágil, precisa e padronizada nos laboratórios clínicos. A predição da susceptibilidade aos antifúngicos, bem como a necessidade da geração de dados epidemiológicos reforçam a importância da identificação rotineira adequada das espécies de leveduras envolvidas em infecções. Dentre as 200 espécies de Candida já descritas, C. albic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these results showed a concordance rate of only 55% for the three methods, these results suggest that conventional methods are not ideal for the quick and accurate identification of samples from clinical sources, since they consume time and their results are subject to errors, and additional identification tests or repetitions are required (Aubertine et al, 2006;Higashi et al, 2015). Graf et al (2000) evaluated Candida and other yeasts using the Vitek 2-YST system in a total of 241 isolates versus automated prior version identification, myoscopy, and agglutination test for C. krusei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although these results showed a concordance rate of only 55% for the three methods, these results suggest that conventional methods are not ideal for the quick and accurate identification of samples from clinical sources, since they consume time and their results are subject to errors, and additional identification tests or repetitions are required (Aubertine et al, 2006;Higashi et al, 2015). Graf et al (2000) evaluated Candida and other yeasts using the Vitek 2-YST system in a total of 241 isolates versus automated prior version identification, myoscopy, and agglutination test for C. krusei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The results for VITEK  2 Compact system are known to be good, as well as the speed of analysis 43 ; however, wrong results may occur. Thus, the use of molecular analysis is required, leading to a higher cost and the need for specialized labor, and this is not the case in most microbiology laboratories 39 .…”
Section: One Of the Alternatives For Distinguishing Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several commercial products and systems have been developed the aim of solve some difficulties experienced by the clinical microbiology laboratories in the diagnosis of infections caused by Candida species [20], for example Agar containing chromo gens, kits and panels semi or full automated to the presumed or definitive identification of the most prevalent species [21,22]. The use of only phenotypic testing is not highly effective for identification of Candida species because some species has few morphological and biochemical variations, therefore phenotypic and molecular methods can be used in together to increase reliability in the identification of these species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%