2013
DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.113.000359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparable Performance of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Abstract: Background Despite the growing epidemic of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), no valid measure of patients’ health status (symptoms, function and quality of life) exists. We evaluated the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a validated measure of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), in HFpEF patients. Methods and Results Using a prospective HF registry, we dichotomized patients into HFrEF (EF ≤ 40) and HFpEF (EF ≥ 50). The associations between NYHA class, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
131
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(48 reference statements)
6
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…69 This instrument has been widely used in recent international HF clinical trials and has been validated in several languages. 16–22 The KCCQ is scored from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 This instrument has been widely used in recent international HF clinical trials and has been validated in several languages. 16–22 The KCCQ is scored from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Effects of nitrite on LV filling pressures will be assessed at trough nitrite concentrations (i.e. prior to study drug dose) using echocardiography (E/e' ratio, left atrial volume index and estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure) and plasma NT-proBNP levels.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Hfpefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each response is given an ordinal value, and scale scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 range, with higher scores indicating better HRQL. KCCQ has been validated in HF populations, including in HF-PEF, 16 and is responsive to important changes in health state. 17,18 A clinically meaningful difference in KCCQ score is established as 5 points.…”
Section: Assessment Of Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%