2016
DOI: 10.4172/jbb.1000304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparability of “Enoxamed” a Tunisian Generic Enoxaparin with the Originator Product: Non-clinical and Clinical Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, LMWHs differ in their PK and PD properties, which could be possibly due to the depolymerization processes or the manufacturing methods that result in its structural variability 12 . Therefore, producing biosimilar LMWH is a challenging task and its market authorization requires adequate evidence that it meets the same standards of quality, efficacy, and safety as of its innovator 13 . To determine bioequivalence, we conducted this study to compare the biological activity of “Cloti‐Xa™”, an enoxaparin sodium‐prefilled syringe of 40 mg/0.4 ml (4000 IU/0.4 ml) with that of the innovator product “Clexane ® ”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, LMWHs differ in their PK and PD properties, which could be possibly due to the depolymerization processes or the manufacturing methods that result in its structural variability 12 . Therefore, producing biosimilar LMWH is a challenging task and its market authorization requires adequate evidence that it meets the same standards of quality, efficacy, and safety as of its innovator 13 . To determine bioequivalence, we conducted this study to compare the biological activity of “Cloti‐Xa™”, an enoxaparin sodium‐prefilled syringe of 40 mg/0.4 ml (4000 IU/0.4 ml) with that of the innovator product “Clexane ® ”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%