2011
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparability of Digital Photography with the ETDRS Film Protocol for Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] These validation studies provide the support for the use of digital images instead of 35mm slides, which now are difficult to get processed and can be onerous in terms of handling and storage. Because of their excellent agreement 222 A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[12][13][14] These validation studies provide the support for the use of digital images instead of 35mm slides, which now are difficult to get processed and can be onerous in terms of handling and storage. Because of their excellent agreement 222 A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although no standard criteria have been widely accepted as performance measurements of digital imagery used for DR evaluation, current clinical trials sponsored by the National Eye Institute have transitioned to digital images for DR assessment. 7,8 Telehealth programs for DR should demonstrate an ability to compare favorably with ETDRS film or digital photography as reflected in kappa values for agreement of diagnosis, falsepositive and false-negative readings, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing levels of DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). [9][10][11][12] Because programs have reported referral-warranted ocular disease in many patients with ungradable images, inability to obtain or grade images should be considered a positive finding and patients with unobtainable or ungradable images should be promptly reimaged or referred for a more advanced evaluation.…”
Section: Clinical Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, reduction of nitrile compounds by NaBH 4 or LiAlH 4 usually leads to the production of amides instead of amines and therefore they cannot provide chemoselectivity. 29 Hence, study on effective and green methodologies for chemoselective transformation of nitrile and nitro compounds to amines is still of a great interest. In recent years, the abundance of published reports on the application of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) is testimony to the considerable attention to functionalization of these carbon scaffolds for various applications such as oxidative dehydrogenation, [30][31][32] sensors for determination of DNA, 33 and MRI contrast agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%