2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05161-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparability of corneal thickness and opacity depth assessed by OCT and UBM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the perspective of detection depth, more and more clinical diagnostic methods have shown considerable advantages. Garcia et al [125] used Optovue OCT, Visaante OCT and ultrasonic thickness gauge to diagnose opaque cornea, and finally measured depths of 534.03 μm, 523.72 μm, and 529.84 μm, which were consistent with the study of MNA penetration depth. The study used a cornea that is very different from the skin tissue, but it provides an alternative method in terms of the detectable depth.…”
Section: Strategies For Appropriate Imagingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…From the perspective of detection depth, more and more clinical diagnostic methods have shown considerable advantages. Garcia et al [125] used Optovue OCT, Visaante OCT and ultrasonic thickness gauge to diagnose opaque cornea, and finally measured depths of 534.03 μm, 523.72 μm, and 529.84 μm, which were consistent with the study of MNA penetration depth. The study used a cornea that is very different from the skin tissue, but it provides an alternative method in terms of the detectable depth.…”
Section: Strategies For Appropriate Imagingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although SMILE is considered a safe, effective, and predictable method in the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism, it is important to understand the influence of cap morphology on refractive results. AS-OCT is very useful in analyzing the morphology of the cornea, since it is a contact-free method which is easy to use and allows for the view of a large surface of the cornea at different depths, as well as for the direct measurement of the cap thickness in different meridians [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A macroscopic evaluation was carried out on each animal, and slit lamp and OCT images were obtained from the right and left eyes after 3 and 12 months of the implant. Corneal opacity was graded according to the classification established by García and cols ( Garcia et al, 2021 ). as mild (grade I), moderate (grade II) and dense (grade III).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%