Purpose
To examine spatial patterns of retinal sensitivity loss in the three key features of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).
Methods
One-hundred individuals (53 iAMD, 47 normal) underwent 10-2 mesopic microperimetry testing in one eye. Pointwise sensitivities (dB) were corrected for age, sex, iAMD status, and co-presence of co-localized key iAMD features: drusen load, pigmentary abnormalities, and reticular pseudodrusen (RPD). Clusters (labeled by ranks of magnitude C
−2
, C
−1
, C
0
) were derived from pointwise sensitivities and then assessed by quadrants and eccentricity/rings.
Results
Two clusters of decreased sensitivities were evident in iAMD versus normal: C
−2
, −1.67 dB (95% CI (confidence intervals), −2.36 to −0.98;
P
< 0.0001); C
−1
, −0.93 dB (95% CI, −1.5 to −0.36;
P
< 0.01). One cluster of decreased sensitivity was independently associated each with increased drusen load (13.57 µm increase per −1 dB;
P
< 0.0001), pigmentary abnormalities (C
−1
: −2.23 dB; 95% CI, −3.36 to −1.1;
P
< 0.01), and RPD (C
−1
: −1.07 dB; 95% CI, −2 to −0.14;
P
< 0.01). Sensitivity loss in iAMD was biased toward the superior and central macula (
P
= 0.16 to <0.0001), aligning with structural distributions of features. However, sensitivity loss associated with drusen load also extended to the peripheral macula (
P
< 0.0001) with paracentral sparing, which was discordant with the central distribution of drusen.
Conclusions
Drusen load, pigmentary abnormalities, and RPD are associated with patterns of retinal sensitivity loss commonly demonstrating superior and central bias. Results highlighted that a clinical focus on these three key iAMD features using structural measures alone does not capture the complex, spatial extent of vision-related functional impairment in iAMD.
Translational Relevance
Defining the spatial patterns of retinal sensitivity loss in iAMD can facilitate a targeted visual field protocol for iAMD assessment.