The interesting article on the antifibrinolytic effect of factor XIII by Rijken et al.[1] was predicated on the assumption that fibrinolysis is mediated only by tissuetype plasminogen activator (t-PA), as that is what was studied. However, there is evidence that this common assumption should be questioned.In a study published almost 30 years ago, we showed that, whereas spontaneous lysis of platelet-poor plasma clots was mediated by t-PA, that of platelet-rich plasma clots, with which this article was concerned, could not be abolished by t-PA antibody, but instead was abolished by the addition of urokinase plaminogen activator (u-PA) antibody. Furthermore, evidence was found that endogenous t-PA promoted the effect of endogenous u-PA, indicating that both activators were involved in endogenous fibrinolysis [2]. Since that time, platelets [3,4] and monocytes [5] have been shown to be carriers of u-PA.In t-PA and u-PA knockout studies, t-PA knockout was not associated with spontaneous fibrin formation, in contrast to u-PA knockout [6], and it also did not inhibit lysis of an intravascular thrombus [7]. In these two studies, eliminating both genes had a major effect on fibrinolysis. The findings are consistent with both activators being involved in endogenous lysis, although u-PA rather than t-PA had the dominant effect.The fact that the level of D-dimer is normally 112-250 ng mL À1 rather than zero provides evidence that endogenous fibrinolysis is an ongoing physiologic process. It is unlikely that t-PA alone, most of which is in an inhibitor complex, can account for this fibrinolytic effect. Therefore, the findings in the above original study, although relevant to t-PA-mediated lysis, cannot be assumed to apply to endogenous fibrinolysis.
Disclosure of Conflict of InterestsThe author states that he has no conflict of interest.