2015
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/38/383001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compaction of bacterial genomic DNA: clarifying the concepts

Abstract: : The unconstrained genomic DNA of bacteria forms a coil, which volume exceeds 1000 times the volume of the cell. Since prokaryotes lack a membrane-bound nucleus, in sharp contrast with eukaryotes, the DNA may consequently be expected to occupy the whole available volume when constrained to fit in the cell. Still, it has been known for more than half a century that the DNA is localized in a well defined region of the cell, called the nucleoid, which occupies only 15% to 25% of the total volume. Although this p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(307 reference statements)
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size results are shown in Appendix A, Figures 10,11 and 12: these correspond to Figures 4, 5 and 6, and were obtained with a protein size of 2σ. The charge results are shown in Appendix B, Figures 13,14,15: these correspond to Figures 3,4,5. In all cases, the trends are qualitatively identical, and confirm our conclusions above. There are quantitative differences for the size simulations when the volume fraction is high: this is expected as, under those situation, it is the volume fraction, rather than number density, which determines the compression pressure and force.…”
Section: Coilingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size results are shown in Appendix A, Figures 10,11 and 12: these correspond to Figures 4, 5 and 6, and were obtained with a protein size of 2σ. The charge results are shown in Appendix B, Figures 13,14,15: these correspond to Figures 3,4,5. In all cases, the trends are qualitatively identical, and confirm our conclusions above. There are quantitative differences for the size simulations when the volume fraction is high: this is expected as, under those situation, it is the volume fraction, rather than number density, which determines the compression pressure and force.…”
Section: Coilingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Here we present the results corresponding to Figures 3,4 and 5 in the main text, but for charged DNA beads and proteins.…”
Section: Appendix B: Effect Of Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models used in this study share several common points with those developed previously to investigate facilitated diffusion, [52][53][54] the interactions of H-NS proteins and DNA, [55][56][57], the formation of the bacterial nucleoid, [4,5,48,[44][45][46][47] as well as questions dealing with spatial confinement and molecular crowding, [58,59] More precisely, genomic DNA is represented by a circular chain of 1440 n = beads of radius a separated at equilibrium by a distance 0 5.0 l = nm, where each bead represents 15 consecutive base pairs. The DNA chain is enclosed in a confining sphere of radius 0 120 R = nm (see Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in the previous theoretical and experimental studies that the DNA polymer compacts and collapses in the presence of the crowding environment (DNA condensation) [16,32]. In the presence of the charged molecular crowders the effective interactions between DNA-DNA segments increases which leads to the segregative phase separation [16,17,33]. The segregative phase separation may happen if two crowders (e.g., protein, RNAs, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%