1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1987.tb01651.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compaction-induced inclination shallowing of the post-depositional remanent magnetization in a synthetic sediment

Abstract: A synthetic sediment comprised of kaolinite, distilled water and either equidimensional or acicular magnetite was given a post-depositional remanent magnetization (PDRM) by being stirred in a magnetic field. This sediment was compacted under pressures which varied continuously from 0 to 0.14 MPa in a water-tank consolidometer and to higher pressure steps (~2 . 5 3 MPa) in a standard soil consolidometer. Compaction took place in the same magnetic field in which the sample was given its PDRM. The compaction caus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
105
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, inclinations of the Tertiary sediment samples in the earlier DSDP study appeared to be biased (13 of a total of 18 samples have a positive inclination). Inclination flattening during sediment compaction (Anson and Kodama, 1987;Arason and Levi, 1990;Deamer and Kodama, 1990;Levi and Baner-jee, 1990;Tarduno, 1990), a mechanism suggested as the explanation of other anomalous paleolatitude records from marine sediments, cannot explain this bias in the polarity distribution. An alternate explanation is that the alternating field (AF) demagnetization conducted in the two studies (to a maximum of 30 mT in the DSDP study, with characteristic inclinations determined at 10 mT, and to a maximum of 15 mT on board Leg 130) was unable to completely remove an overprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, inclinations of the Tertiary sediment samples in the earlier DSDP study appeared to be biased (13 of a total of 18 samples have a positive inclination). Inclination flattening during sediment compaction (Anson and Kodama, 1987;Arason and Levi, 1990;Deamer and Kodama, 1990;Levi and Baner-jee, 1990;Tarduno, 1990), a mechanism suggested as the explanation of other anomalous paleolatitude records from marine sediments, cannot explain this bias in the polarity distribution. An alternate explanation is that the alternating field (AF) demagnetization conducted in the two studies (to a maximum of 30 mT in the DSDP study, with characteristic inclinations determined at 10 mT, and to a maximum of 15 mT on board Leg 130) was unable to completely remove an overprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Hence, there is probably a bias in inclination due to a secondary component. The most important cause of the inclination error, however, is most likely due to compaction and its magnitude is clearly related to the carbonate content [27], a result which is known from earlier studies [28,29].…”
Section: Nrm Componentsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…This is significantly different from the site geographical latitude of 12.49°N. Because the mean inclination is shallower than that corresponding to a geocentric axial dipole field (Io = 23.89°), a small but systematic inclination error of about 5 1/2° due to compaction may be present in this fine-grained globigerina ooze (ANSON and KODAMA, 1987;ARASON and LEVI, 1990a, b;GORDON, 1990;ABRAHAMSEN, 1992).…”
Section: Inclinationmentioning
confidence: 76%