2019
DOI: 10.1002/mop.31792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact UWB MIMO antenna with cross‐shaped unconnected ground stub using characteristic mode analysis

Abstract: In this letter, a compact ultrawideband (UWB) multi‐input‐multi‐output (MIMO) antenna with cross‐shaped unconnected Ground stub using characteristic mode analysis (CMA) is presented. The proposed work consists of two elliptical shape monopole UWB antenna with a cross‐shaped stub in the ground plane. The compact MIMO antenna has the dimension of 25 × 25 × 1.6 mm3. These monopoles are able to excite several characteristic modes (CMs), which support to wideband resonance, and cross‐shaped stub support CM at lower… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with a slit on the shared circular‐shaped radiator, an inverted Y‐shaped stub has been introduced in the ground plane at an angle of 45° (Srivastava & Kanuijia, 2015) to minimize the MC. Because of instrumental contributions of protruding ground stub structures in reducing MC particularly among wideband and UWB‐MIMO antenna elements many such designs have been introduced, among those some popular designs are folded Y‐shaped (Khan et al., 2015), diagonally integrated strip (Chacko et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2014), extended rectangular stub (Yoon et al., 2011), protruded I‐shaped stub at an angle of 45° (Zhu et al., 2016), an inverted pair of L‐shaped strips (Chandel et al., 2018; Khan et al., 2017a), an inverted L‐shaped strip (Kumar et al., 2019b), tree‐like stub (Zhang et al., 2009) as represented in Figure 14a, arrowhead‐shaped stub at an angle of 45° (Zhu et al., 2016), an inverted L‐shaped and I‐shaped stub (Liu et al., 2013) as represented in Figure 14b, funnel‐shaped stub (Gautam et al., 2018), circular arcs shaped stubs (Mathur & Dwari, 2018b), extended curved stub (Biswal & Das, 2019), partial ground T‐shaped stub (Malviya et al., 2016a), inverted L‐shaped stub integrated with T‐shaped slot (Singh et al., 2013), etching T‐shaped slot on the radiator and extended arrow‐shaped stub (Mao & Chu, 2014), pair of extended I‐shaped (Sharawi et al., 2011), a rectangular slot with one circular end embedded with two inverted‐L‐shaped branches (Shoaib et al., 2014), a cross‐shaped stub (Singh & Tripathi, 2019), F‐shaped stubs (Iqbal et al., 2017), a dual‐inverted‐L‐shaped ground branch with a slot (Zeng et al., 2012), two protruded ground parts (Li et al., 2013), a stepped stub at an angle of 45° (Biswal & Das, 2018a), two inverted L‐shaped and one I‐shaped stub (Hong et al., 2008), a pair of L‐stubs, spiral stubs, and L‐slots (Huang et al., 2015a), narrow metallic and slot stubs (Krishna & Kumar, 2016), grounded stub along with two F‐dual grounded circular ring resonator (Mathur & Dwari, 2019a) as represented in Figure 15a, two F‐shaped stub and rectangular slots (Wani & Vishwakarma, 2016) as described in Figure 15b, a simple I‐shaped stub (Mchbal et al., 2018), a rectangular vertical arm (Saxena et al., 2017), inverted L...…”
Section: Isolation Techniques Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with a slit on the shared circular‐shaped radiator, an inverted Y‐shaped stub has been introduced in the ground plane at an angle of 45° (Srivastava & Kanuijia, 2015) to minimize the MC. Because of instrumental contributions of protruding ground stub structures in reducing MC particularly among wideband and UWB‐MIMO antenna elements many such designs have been introduced, among those some popular designs are folded Y‐shaped (Khan et al., 2015), diagonally integrated strip (Chacko et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2014), extended rectangular stub (Yoon et al., 2011), protruded I‐shaped stub at an angle of 45° (Zhu et al., 2016), an inverted pair of L‐shaped strips (Chandel et al., 2018; Khan et al., 2017a), an inverted L‐shaped strip (Kumar et al., 2019b), tree‐like stub (Zhang et al., 2009) as represented in Figure 14a, arrowhead‐shaped stub at an angle of 45° (Zhu et al., 2016), an inverted L‐shaped and I‐shaped stub (Liu et al., 2013) as represented in Figure 14b, funnel‐shaped stub (Gautam et al., 2018), circular arcs shaped stubs (Mathur & Dwari, 2018b), extended curved stub (Biswal & Das, 2019), partial ground T‐shaped stub (Malviya et al., 2016a), inverted L‐shaped stub integrated with T‐shaped slot (Singh et al., 2013), etching T‐shaped slot on the radiator and extended arrow‐shaped stub (Mao & Chu, 2014), pair of extended I‐shaped (Sharawi et al., 2011), a rectangular slot with one circular end embedded with two inverted‐L‐shaped branches (Shoaib et al., 2014), a cross‐shaped stub (Singh & Tripathi, 2019), F‐shaped stubs (Iqbal et al., 2017), a dual‐inverted‐L‐shaped ground branch with a slot (Zeng et al., 2012), two protruded ground parts (Li et al., 2013), a stepped stub at an angle of 45° (Biswal & Das, 2018a), two inverted L‐shaped and one I‐shaped stub (Hong et al., 2008), a pair of L‐stubs, spiral stubs, and L‐slots (Huang et al., 2015a), narrow metallic and slot stubs (Krishna & Kumar, 2016), grounded stub along with two F‐dual grounded circular ring resonator (Mathur & Dwari, 2019a) as represented in Figure 15a, two F‐shaped stub and rectangular slots (Wani & Vishwakarma, 2016) as described in Figure 15b, a simple I‐shaped stub (Mchbal et al., 2018), a rectangular vertical arm (Saxena et al., 2017), inverted L...…”
Section: Isolation Techniques Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3.5 GHz centered notched band is obtained by etching slots in the radiators. In article [12], a 25×25 mm 2 dimension UWB antenna operating in 2.97-13.8 GHz bandwidth is fabricated. A cross-shaped un-connected ground stub is proposed to enhance isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting multi-period EBG structure made by this method will remain uni-planer and thus attract filter designers [16]. Another small size UWB MIMO antenna with the dimensions of 25 × 25 ×1.6 mm 3 , having cross shaped isolated ground stub and operating in 2.97-13.8GHz frequency band, is presented in [17]. The antenna has a high isolation (S21< -15 dB), low ECC (< 0.05) and a high diversity gain (DG > 9.97).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%