1986
DOI: 10.1016/0167-899x(86)90014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact reversed-field pinch reactors (CRFPR)

Abstract: A major purpose of the Technical Information Center is to provide the broadest dissemination possible of information contained in DOE'S Research and Development Reports to business, industry, the academic community, and federal, state and local governments. Although a small portion of this report is not reproducible, it is being made available to expedite the availability of information on the research discussed herein.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several fusion power plant studies based on the RFP configuration were undertaken in the 1980s with a goal to identify compact, high-power-density options as the basis for fusion reactors with mass power density competitive with fission reactors [636,637]. The TITAN reactor concept [638][639][640][641] was the most detailed of these studies for the RFP.…”
Section: Rfp Reactor Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several fusion power plant studies based on the RFP configuration were undertaken in the 1980s with a goal to identify compact, high-power-density options as the basis for fusion reactors with mass power density competitive with fission reactors [636,637]. The TITAN reactor concept [638][639][640][641] was the most detailed of these studies for the RFP.…”
Section: Rfp Reactor Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three other modern facilities (RFX in Italy, RELAX in Japan, and EXTRAP-T2R in Sweden) form the key elements of the international RFP experimental program. In the 1980s, the advantages of RFP as a power plant have been demonstrated through a few conceptual studies [38][39][40]. The major differences between these designs are in the physics and engineering parameters (refer to Figure 5).…”
Section: Magnetic Fusion Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%