2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43425-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Representation of Solution Vectors in Kronecker-Based Markovian Analysis

Abstract: Abstract.It is well known that the infinitesimal generator underlying a multi-dimensional Markov chain with a relatively large reachable state space can be represented compactly on a computer in the form of a block matrix in which each nonzero block is expressed as a sum of Kronecker products of smaller matrices. Nevertheless, solution vectors used in the analysis of such Kronecker-based Markovian representations still require memory proportional to the size of the reachable state space, and this becomes a big… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Storing the infinitesimal generator matrix in Kronecker form requires the truncated state space to be represented as a union of Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces. 49,56 Two algorithms for partitioning an arbitrary multidimensional state space into Cartesian products have been proposed. 65 However, these two algorithms are relatively time consuming and do not seem to be suitable for our purposes in this context.…”
Section: Choosing the Truncated State Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Storing the infinitesimal generator matrix in Kronecker form requires the truncated state space to be represented as a union of Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces. 49,56 Two algorithms for partitioning an arbitrary multidimensional state space into Cartesian products have been proposed. 65 However, these two algorithms are relatively time consuming and do not seem to be suitable for our purposes in this context.…”
Section: Choosing the Truncated State Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45][46][47][48] HTD may be considered as a generalization of the TT decomposition in which basis and core matrices are related through a tree structure with logarithmic depth in the number of dimensions that reduces the complexity of the Tucker decomposition by hierarchically splitting the core tensor into core matrices. An advantage of the HTD representation for our purposes is that the multiplication of a compact solution vector in HTD format with a sum of Kronecker products is a well-defined operation 49 and has recently been used in the steady-state analysis of Kronecker-based CTMCs. 50 In the CME setting, such a Kronecker-based Markovian analysis with vectors in HTD format is possible under the separability assumption of transition rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensor train decomposition has been applied in [13] to approximate the solution vector for models where the product space is reachable using an alternating least squares approach or the Power method. To the best of our knowledge, HTD was first applied to hierarchically structured CTMCs in [14]. Therein, it is shown that a compact solution vector in HTD format can be multiplied with a sum of Kronecker products to yield another compact solution vector in HTD format.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessitates some kind of truncation, hence, approximation, to be introduced to the addition operation. To investigate the merit of the approach, the following analysis was performed in [14]. Starting from an initial solution, the compact vector in HTD format was iteratively multiplied with the uniformized generator matrix of a given CTMC in Kronecker form 1000 times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation