2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.24.050102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact S -band linear accelerator system for ultrafast, ultrahigh dose-rate radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In addition, recent preclinical studies increasingly support the clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy (RT). [15][16][17][18] In most studies on the FLASH effect, dedicated electron accelerators [19][20][21][22][23] or modified clinical linear accelerators [24][25][26] were used, delivering electron pulses of ultra-high dose per pulse (UH-DPP) in the range from 0.5 to 10 Gy/pulse. However, these somewhat extreme irradiation conditions are indeed challenging in terms of dosimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In addition, recent preclinical studies increasingly support the clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy (RT). [15][16][17][18] In most studies on the FLASH effect, dedicated electron accelerators [19][20][21][22][23] or modified clinical linear accelerators [24][25][26] were used, delivering electron pulses of ultra-high dose per pulse (UH-DPP) in the range from 0.5 to 10 Gy/pulse. However, these somewhat extreme irradiation conditions are indeed challenging in terms of dosimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…than 1% to comply with the dose measurement protocol with a plane parallel ionisation chamber for electron radiotherapy [11]. To achieve this, a conservative position is to require a DR lower than 1% after 4 µs of beam pulse, which is the maximum pulse width value that the ElectronFlash machine (EF) can deliver [3]. The DR must therefore be less than 0.25% • µs −1 to avoid a posteriori numerical DR corrections which depend on the beam pulse shape and irradiation conditions.…”
Section: Jinst 17 P08018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of UHDR is due to the FLASH effect, a biological effect that induces a tumour control, as in Conventional Radiotherapy (CONV-RT), and a significant reduction of the toxicities induced on healthy tissues (skin, organs at risk) [2]. There is no indication that the sparing effectiveness of FLASH-RT would rest on the type of radiation but most of the pre-clinical studies investigating the FLASH effect have been conducted so far using electron beams generated by dedicated or modified clinical LINACs with energies not exceeding 20 MeV [3,4]. The chemical and biological mechanisms explaining the FLASH effect are still under investigation, however, a difference in term of oxygen concentration and cell reparation processes might explain the sparing effect between tumour and healthy cells [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further research is needed to understand the benefits and limitations of this methodology fully and to determine the best use cases for its application in clinical settings. Currently, only a few dedicated electrons linacs are employed for experimental research [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], ongoing studies and technological advancements aim to make these linacs more compact and cost-effective for highenergy electrons. The ultimate goal is to use these linacs to treat deep tumors with FLASH radiotherapy in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%