2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:opte.0000038889.84284.c7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact Mathematical Formulation for Graph Partitioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36]), appropriate global cuts (e.g. [50]) or special formulations [25,8] based on the problem structure. The main limitation of the methods in this category is that they are difficult to generalize and/or to be made automatic.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36]), appropriate global cuts (e.g. [50]) or special formulations [25,8] based on the problem structure. The main limitation of the methods in this category is that they are difficult to generalize and/or to be made automatic.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40]), appropriate global cuts (e.g. [60]) or special formulations [30,9] based on the problem structure. The main limitation of the methods in this category is that they are difficult to generalize and/or to be made automatic.…”
Section: Symmetry In Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1, 2)(3, 4)(5, 6)(7, 8)(9, 10)(11, 12), (1, 3)(2, 4), (3, 5)(4, 6), (5, 7)(6, 8), (7,9) (8,10), (9,11) …”
Section: For Any H ≤ G If G(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different formulations of varying sizes where the clusters have maximal given cardinality have been proposed and compared in (Boulle 2004). A problem variant with node capacities has been studied in (Ferreira et al 1996).…”
Section: Graph Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%