Compact Development Policy and Urban Resilience: A Critical Review

Abstract

Sustainable development and urban resilience are dominant urban planning paradigms that have become buzzwords in urban planning and policy domains over the past 2–3 decades. While these two paradigms have been analyzed and scrutinized in different studies, the interconnection between them in policy realms is understudied. Compact development policy is expected to contribute to a variety of sustainability goals. However, these goals’ alignment with the principles and goals of urban resilience is under question. This research tries to shed some light on this issue. A critical review method is employed to understand how compactness as a sustainable urban development policy relates to different principles and dimensions of urban resilience. First, the conceptual and theoretical relationship between urban resilience and compact city is established. Next, the resulting framework is used to critically analyze 124 articles to understand how the compact city policy relates to urban resilience from different dimensions and principles. Densification and intensification, mixed land use and diversity, and spatial connectivity and public transportation are identified as principles of the compact city. Finally, the interconnection between compact city policy and urban resilience dimensions and principles is explored and assessed through examining the selected literature. The results of the review show some alignments between compact city policy outcomes and urban resilience. However, the level of alignment may vary depending on the context, scale, or dimension. In other words, while compact city in one scale/dimension can increase urban resilience to a specific adverse event or stressor, it might increase vulnerability to others in another scale/dimension. From the policy perspective, compact development policy and urban resilience principles should clearly be defined a priori to reach favorable outcomes.

Density and Urban Resilience, Cross-Section Analysis in an Iranian Metropolis Context

“…While density seems to be a critical issue in reaching urban resilience, the empirical analysis in this research does not support this general idea [7]. However, social and physical resilience are the areas of urban resilience dimensions that have a stronger relationship with density variables.…”

“…After COVID-19, both sustainability and resiliency of urbanization have been criticized, as cities were the hotspots of the pandemic [5,6]. While these two areas have been theoretically and conceptually investigated in the literature, the alignment between them has not deliberately been investigated [7].…”

Spatial compactness and carbon emission: Nighttime light satellite‐based exposure assessment

“…Using Italian cross‐sectional data, Cirilli and Veneri (2014) demonstrated that compact urban areas are associated with lower levels of CO 2 emissions. Dehghani et al (2022) regarded compact urban development as one type of sustainable urban development policy, and has found that there is some degree of alignment between the outcomes of compact city policy and urban resilience. However, some scholars hold opposing views and question the role of compact development in promoting urban sustainability (Chen, Zhang, & Ruan, 2021; Gordon & Richardson, 1997; Sha et al, 2020; Sun et al, 2020).…”

Analysis of the Severity of Accidents on Rural Roads Using Statistical and Artificial Neural Network Methods

“…With the rapid growth of the economy, the transportation of rural roads plays a critical role in the system of country transportation [2][3][4]. Tus, it is necessary to make an accurate plan to reduce the destructive efects and evaluate the effectiveness of previously conducted activities [5,6]. Te examination and planning will not be carried out without collecting data and predicting the condition of the future [7,8].…”