2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact design for high precision machine tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can include further reducing the number, size and weight of manufacturing machines, while increasing their robustness during transportation and operation amidst less controlled environments. There are already some examples of radical reductions in the sizes of machine tools: for example, from more than 20 cubic metres (e.g., 3 × 3 × 2.5 m) to less than two cubic metres [39,40]. Important topics include reducing the size and weight of hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools [41] and reducing uncertainty of machine tool calibration [42].…”
Section: Implications For Manufacturing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can include further reducing the number, size and weight of manufacturing machines, while increasing their robustness during transportation and operation amidst less controlled environments. There are already some examples of radical reductions in the sizes of machine tools: for example, from more than 20 cubic metres (e.g., 3 × 3 × 2.5 m) to less than two cubic metres [39,40]. Important topics include reducing the size and weight of hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools [41] and reducing uncertainty of machine tool calibration [42].…”
Section: Implications For Manufacturing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erkorkmaz [11] analyzed a precision X-Y working stage along the X,Y and Z axis respectively, while Eisenbies [12] analyzed a CMM machine and Sun [13] analyzed an ultraprecision flycutting machine tool along the same axis direction. Error budget analysis on five-axis machine are done by Cheng [14], Brecher [15] and Treib [16] ,but their analysis are also along the X,Y and Z axis respectively. Ibaraki [17] identified the machine tool errors by machining tests of stepped workpiece, and the map between the machine tool errors and workpiece errors is constructed.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorndorf et al [6] studied the optimal allocation of static machine error around the minimum cost, in which considering the probability characteristics of the errors. Brecher et al [7] used the error allocation in the compact design of machine tools for providing the possibility to avoid, separate and compensate the machine errors. Uriarte et al [8] made the overall error allocation for a micro-milling machine, mainly considering the collet angular deformation and tool deflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%