2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in family practice: a cross sectional study

Abstract: BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequent and often coexists with other diseases. The aim of this study was to quantify the prevalence of COPD and related chronic comorbidity among patients aged over 40 years visiting family practices in an area of Madrid.MethodsAn observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in a health area of the Madrid Autonomous Region (Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid). The practice population totalled 198,670 persons attended by 129 Family Physici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
72
3
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
16
72
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the national survey which found COPD prevalence in male (5.3%) to be greater than female (1.4%). 8 Same results are shown in the studies by Almagro et al 16 (353 of 398 subjects) and Yamasaki et al 4 (462 of 608 subjects). One explanation may be that cigarette smoking as a risk factor of COPD is more common in male than female.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to the national survey which found COPD prevalence in male (5.3%) to be greater than female (1.4%). 8 Same results are shown in the studies by Almagro et al 16 (353 of 398 subjects) and Yamasaki et al 4 (462 of 608 subjects). One explanation may be that cigarette smoking as a risk factor of COPD is more common in male than female.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…8,9 Apart from the differences in study location and potential risk factors, our small simple size may explain this difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations