2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidity in patients with cancer: Prevalence and severity measured by cumulative illness rating scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
31
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An advantage of CIRS-G is the registration of morbidities in defined organ systems [11,12,16]. Depending on the inclusion criteria, this score among geriatric patients lies between 19.7 [23], 5.5 [29] and 2.4 [30], whereby the CIRS-G in studies such as ours on elective surgery in very elderly patients is seen to be in the lower range [30]. The comparatively low CIRS-G score of 4.07 in our study shows that the elderly patients who underwent pelvic floor surgery in our department had relatively good general conditions and following their entitlement to an appropriate quality of life chose to undergo elective urogynaecological surgery.…”
Section: Co-morbidity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of CIRS-G is the registration of morbidities in defined organ systems [11,12,16]. Depending on the inclusion criteria, this score among geriatric patients lies between 19.7 [23], 5.5 [29] and 2.4 [30], whereby the CIRS-G in studies such as ours on elective surgery in very elderly patients is seen to be in the lower range [30]. The comparatively low CIRS-G score of 4.07 in our study shows that the elderly patients who underwent pelvic floor surgery in our department had relatively good general conditions and following their entitlement to an appropriate quality of life chose to undergo elective urogynaecological surgery.…”
Section: Co-morbidity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to 2 reasons: First, to date, a superiority of R-CHOP-14 over R-CHOP- 21 has not yet been shown in randomized trials and, second, many oncologists without experience with R-CHOP-14 are concerned because they assume a higher toxicity of the 2-week regimen.…”
Section: R-chop-14 Versus R-chop-21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comorbidities and their functional consequences can be measured by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. 21 However, conduction of a complete geriatric assessment (CGA) is time-consuming and often impractical in a modern oncology practice, given logistic and resource constraints. Screening tools (eg, Vulnerable Elders Survey; VES-13 22 ) to identify those at-risk patients in need of a more formal CGA require prospective validation in oncology.…”
Section: Comorbidities and Organ Dysfunctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the American SEER program that in patients presenting colorectal cancer after 80 years of age, multimorbidity (congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus) is common and exerts a substantial effect on survival with close to 21% of deaths attributable to these comorbidities [13]. It could be more relevant to take into consideration the performance status or (preferably) the CIRS-G (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in Geriatrics Score) at the time of diagnosis [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%