2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-7310(02)79223-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cómo mejorar la calidad de la publicación de ensayos clínicos: la declaración CONSORT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the oldest works did not usually follow these quality guidelines; for example, the first documents that used the CONSORT criteria date back to 1996 [64], and their use was progressive. If clinical trials have an inadequate methodology or, especially, if the final description of the trial does not contain certain information, readers cannot adequately judge the validity of the study, and the scientific evidence related to the results is very limited [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the oldest works did not usually follow these quality guidelines; for example, the first documents that used the CONSORT criteria date back to 1996 [64], and their use was progressive. If clinical trials have an inadequate methodology or, especially, if the final description of the trial does not contain certain information, readers cannot adequately judge the validity of the study, and the scientific evidence related to the results is very limited [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMI was provided in the vast majority of the studies, and it was considered that those that did not provide a clear measure to evaluate interventions [29,48,54,55] could not have adequately reported their results. This inadequate description of clinical studies can be, in any case, a waste of time for those who seek valid information derived from clinical trials [65]. The lack of information in a publication can result in the work being excluded when carrying out a systematic review on a certain intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the clinical trials have inadequate methodology, especially if the final description of the trial does not contain certain information, these issues are a hurdle for readers since they are unable to judge adequately the validity of the study and the scientific evidence related to the results will be very limited [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%