1969
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1969-0236331-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commuting functions with no common fixed point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Az = Bz = Sz = Tz = z and z is a common fixed point of A, B, S and T. The uniqueness of a common fixed point can be easily verified by using (2). The other cases (a i), (02) and (03) Ty) for all x, y, 6 X, where 0 < a < 1 and any one of (ai)-(a4).…”
Section: Then the Pair (A S) Is Compatible Of Type (I) (Resp Type (mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, Az = Bz = Sz = Tz = z and z is a common fixed point of A, B, S and T. The uniqueness of a common fixed point can be easily verified by using (2). The other cases (a i), (02) and (03) Ty) for all x, y, 6 X, where 0 < a < 1 and any one of (ai)-(a4).…”
Section: Then the Pair (A S) Is Compatible Of Type (I) (Resp Type (mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The fixed point theory of commuting mappings has been an interesting and ever growing area of enquiry since the famous problem that whether two commuting continuous mappings on an interval have a common fixed point, was settled in the negative (see [2], [12]). Various applications (see for example, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], [13][14][15]), weakenings (resp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1967 both W. M. Boyce [4] and H. Huneke [29] gave counterexamples to the problem. It is interesting to note that the mappings in Huneke's counterexample have Lipschitz constant 3 + √ 6.…”
Section: R-treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of more than one function. In 1969, Boyce [4] and Huneke [19] independently published samples of two commuting continuous maps f, g of [0, 1] into itself without a common f.p. ; i.e., for no point x ∈ [0, 1], f (x) = x = g(x) is true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%