2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8708(03)00141-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commutator structure of operator ideals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
154
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
154
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For p > 1, the ideal L p,∞ does not admit a non-zero trace while for p = 1, there exists a plethora of traces on L 1,∞ (see e.g. [9] or [14]). An example of a trace on L 1,∞ is the restriction (from M 1,∞ ) of the Dixmier trace introduced in [8] that we now explain.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For p > 1, the ideal L p,∞ does not admit a non-zero trace while for p = 1, there exists a plethora of traces on L 1,∞ (see e.g. [9] or [14]). An example of a trace on L 1,∞ is the restriction (from M 1,∞ ) of the Dixmier trace introduced in [8] that we now explain.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider auxiliary multilinear mappings which generalise the mappings W m , 1 ≤ m ≤ p, introduced above in Equation (9). For A ⊂ {1, .…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For later use, we now recall a few facts concerning Banach ideals of operators on the complex Hilbert space H (see [15] and also [13]). For all T ∈ B(H) denote…”
Section: Symplectic Leaves In Preduals Of Operator Idealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the topological level, this corresponds to the fact that any two symmetric norming functions define the same topology (in fact, the norm topology) on any unitary orbit of a finite-rank operator, as a consequence of Lemma 4.3. We should point out that there exist a large variety of symmetric norming functions, defining various types of operator ideals like Schatten, Lorentz, Orlicz and so on (see [13] for a survey of this subject). By way of illustrating this remark, we recall that we have already mentioned in Remark 4.2(iii) the functions Φ p (·) = · ℓ p that define the Schatten ideals.…”
Section: Notation 54mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For p > 1, the ideal L p,∞ does not admit a non-zero trace while for p = 1, there exists a plethora of traces on L 1,∞ (see e.g. [18] or [25]). An example of a trace on L 1,∞ is the Dixmier trace introduced in [15] that we now explain.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%