“…Nonprofit location theory is not a distinctive field within geography, which is not surprising since even the public location theory is only a few decades old (DeVerteuil 2000). Most of the time, scholars of the nonprofit theory use a supply and demand framework, with supply referring to the presence of funding and demand to the needs of the local population (Gronbjerg and Paarlberg 2001;Wolch and Geiger 1983). In this model, location choices are a tradeoff between these two forces.…”
The budgets of development NGOs have risen dramatically over the last decades. In stark contrast to bilateral donors, the geographic choices of NGOs remain virtually unexplored. Using a new dataset and Lorenz curves, this paper shows that NGOs are very active in some countries and hardly active in others. A clustering of NGO activity takes place in UN-labelled high priority countries, but ample room for improved targeting exists. Aid concentration curves provide insight into whether NGOs target the same countries as bilateral donors. The article concludes that this is the case and that NGOs are thus acting as complements. The drawback of this complementary approach is that it reinforces the donor-darling/donor-orphan divide. The paper concludes with some research suggestions and preliminary policy implications.
“…Nonprofit location theory is not a distinctive field within geography, which is not surprising since even the public location theory is only a few decades old (DeVerteuil 2000). Most of the time, scholars of the nonprofit theory use a supply and demand framework, with supply referring to the presence of funding and demand to the needs of the local population (Gronbjerg and Paarlberg 2001;Wolch and Geiger 1983). In this model, location choices are a tradeoff between these two forces.…”
The budgets of development NGOs have risen dramatically over the last decades. In stark contrast to bilateral donors, the geographic choices of NGOs remain virtually unexplored. Using a new dataset and Lorenz curves, this paper shows that NGOs are very active in some countries and hardly active in others. A clustering of NGO activity takes place in UN-labelled high priority countries, but ample room for improved targeting exists. Aid concentration curves provide insight into whether NGOs target the same countries as bilateral donors. The article concludes that this is the case and that NGOs are thus acting as complements. The drawback of this complementary approach is that it reinforces the donor-darling/donor-orphan divide. The paper concludes with some research suggestions and preliminary policy implications.
“…While states and localities with higher taxes are indicative of higher demand for public spending, all else equal, nonprofit charities should be expected to locate in these areas to maximize the value of their tax exemption benefits. In fact, the literature has largely found that the number of nonprofit organizations actually operating in high-stress and high-need areas tends to decrease (Bielefeld, 2000;Grønbjerg & Paarlberg, 2001;Peck, 2008). In addition, Twombly (2003) found that economic need is not associated with nonprofit entry into metropolitan regions.…”
Section: Nonprofit Charities Tax Exemptions and Rent-seekingmentioning
“…Coupled with individual donors' propensity to fund initiatives within their own political jurisdictions (Wolpert, 1993), high degrees of jurisdictional fragmentation and geographical dispersion can constrain the ability of nonprofit providers to expand beyond their immediate municipal boundaries (Esparza & Hamilton, 2012). As a result, services do not always locate where demand is greatest, but rather where supply can be supported (Grønbjerg & Paarlberg, 2001).…”
Section: Interorganizational Collaboration Formation In Suburbiamentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.