2013
DOI: 10.1142/s0219525913500033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Structure Detection in the Evolution of the United States Airport Network

Abstract: pairs of domestic airports and the number of passengers carried. The topological properties and the volume of people travelling are both studied in detail, revealing high heterogeneity in space and time. A recently-developed community structure detection method, accounting for the spatial nature of these networks, is applied and reveals a picture of the communities within. The patterns of communities plotted for each bi-monthly interval reveal some interesting seasonal variations of passenger flows and airport… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former structure, travelers need to transfer at an intermediary airport (i.e., hub) to reach their destinations, whereas in the latter one, only non-stop flights exist. Similar structures have also emerged in air transport networks in other geographies, such as the US and Europe [6,7]. Importantly, however, "real-hubbing" in terms of a connection-based wave structure, has been relatively stable and occurs at only four airports: Beijing (PEK), Shanghai (PVG), Guangzhou (CAN) and Kunming (KMG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the former structure, travelers need to transfer at an intermediary airport (i.e., hub) to reach their destinations, whereas in the latter one, only non-stop flights exist. Similar structures have also emerged in air transport networks in other geographies, such as the US and Europe [6,7]. Importantly, however, "real-hubbing" in terms of a connection-based wave structure, has been relatively stable and occurs at only four airports: Beijing (PEK), Shanghai (PVG), Guangzhou (CAN) and Kunming (KMG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Particularly, regional airports are often close to each other and are faced with either cooperation/integration or competition strategies among them. Hubs or community airports too are not exempt from this challenge and the evolution of airport networks is also an indirect effect of different strategies [18,19].…”
Section: Airport Roles and Clustering Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we propose to resort to community detection algorithms to determine weakly interacting clusters of flights. The use of complex network methods in air traffic management has been used in several contexts [19][20][21][22][23][24]. For example, community detection algorithms have been applied to the networks of airports, sectors, or navigation points to investigate their structure [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of complex network methods in air traffic management has been used in several contexts [19][20][21][22][23][24]. For example, community detection algorithms have been applied to the networks of airports, sectors, or navigation points to investigate their structure [22,23]. can be built, where two flights are linked if they are likely to influence each other in an optimisation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%