Community’s Social Construction on Covid-19 Patients with Supervision in Surakarta Indonesia

Abstract

Negative stigma labelled against Covid-19 patients and health workers can worsen Covid-19 management situation. Therefore, this research aimed to analyze Surakarta people’s interpretation on Covid-19 patient and their social construction process on Covid-19 patient in Surakarta Indonesia. This qualitative research with phenomenological research employed purposive sampling technique. Research informants consisted of Surakarta people, Pulmonologists and Nurses in Dr. Moewardi Surakarta Hospital, Chief Executive of Covid-19 Management Acceleration Task force of Surakarta City, etc. Online observation, in-depth interview, and documentation with internet media were used to collect primary and secondary data. Method and data source triangulations were used to validate data. Interactive model of analysis was conducted using Berger’s Social Construction theory. Surakarta People’s social construction on Covid-19 positive patients passed through some process: Externalization process indicated with Surakarta people’s early perception on Covid-19 as a new disease known poorly, thereby generating fear and ignorance among them; Objectification process showing people with varying perspectives on Covid-19 positive patients; and Internalization process finding the subjective reality of Surakarta People on Covid-19 patients affected by objectification stage, later creating interpretation on individual or group having ever interacted with this virus patient.

Lessons from the frontline: The COVID-19 pandemic emergency care experience from a human resource perspective in the Pacific region

“…Consistent with the handful of qualitative studies on HCWs responding to the COVID-19 crisis in LMICs (e.g. Colombia, Nepal, Iran, China, Indonesia, Brazil, Sri Lanka) and high-income nations, 12 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 we found Pacific EC and other frontline HCWs experienced physical exhaustion and mental health challenges exacerbated by workforce shortages, being stretched well-beyond capacity, limited access to mental health services, lack of appropriate compensation and incentive, and the experience of isolation, stigma and discrimination from colleagues, family and community. Participants spoke of the overlapping personal and professional tensions they faced in protecting their family and local community from COVID-19, versus their duty to serve their patients, profession, and country.…”