This paper examines the origins, development, and current status of the sociology of knowledge in American sociology. If a traditional and narrow definition of the sociology of knowledge is employed, few American studies appear to fall into this area of interest. However, when the sociology of knowledge is defined as a general frame of reference that is utilized in various research endeavors, definite orientations can be recognized. Most studies are seen as falling under one or more of the questions posed by Robert K. Merton in his paradigm for the sociology of knowledge. The paper concludes with a discussion of possible future trends.In 1959, Kurt H. Wolff made note of the fact that much of the problem concerning the lack of a precise definition of the sociology of knowledge has resulted from the literal translation of the term Wissenssoziologie (1959:568). The effect of this literal translation has been to narrow, in the mind of contemporary sociologists, the range of problems originally encompassed within Wissenssoziologie. While claiming to be aware of the interdependent relationship between thoughts and the environment as an appropriate subject matter, sociologists have continued to operate primarily on the basis of "groups influencing behavior." Max Scheler, in his emphasis of the relational aspect, formulated the sociology of knowledge to demonstrate how social reality determined the existence of ideas, but not necessarily their nature. Today, the sociologist tends to take the former as a given and then concentrates upon how,the nature of ideas is determined by the sociocultural environment. For'examples, studies on time as a socia-cultural product, studies surrounding the Sapir-Wharf Hypothesis, and studies in the area of achievement motivation are only a few illustrations of this tendency.Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann (1966) note that the stated concern of the sociology of knowledge has been with the relationship between the individual and society variable. However, they fail to note that in almost all of the empirical and theoretical work carried out within the area, the focus has been upon the social determination of the mental systems of society (see especially Curtis and Petras, 1970d). In this paper, we have treated the sociology of knowledge as a particular frame of reference utilized with some consistency by sociologists. We have not treated the area as representing a definite body of theory itself.Coupled with the traditional and narrow delineation of the approach in contemporary sociology has been a focusing, in terms of subject matter, upon the role played by the social order in determining the mental perspectives of individual members. This is of interest in view of the fact that the formalization of the sociology of knowledge in the works of the German philosopher-sociologist Max Scheler was based upon the interdependent relationship between the mind and KJS VIII,2 181Fall 1972