2006
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community photosynthesis of aquatic macrophytes

Abstract: We compared 190 photosynthesis-irradiance (P-E) experiments with single-and multispecies communities of macroalgae and vascular plants from freshwater and marine habitats. We found a typical hyperbolic P-E relation in all communities and no sign of photosaturation or photoinhibition of photosynthesis at the highest irradiances of about 2,000 mmol m 22 s 21 . Macrophyte communities displayed much higher maximum gross production (GP max ), respiration, and light compensation point than separate phytoelements bec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
105
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant factor driving primary productivity in the seagrass beds was ambient light level (Fig. 3), with no indication of saturation of gross productivity, as has been observed with other aquatic macrophytes (Binzer et al, 2006;Rheuban et al, 2014). Productivity of seagrass beds in Big Lagoon was also comparable to that of prior studies that took place in Mississippi (Moncreiff et al, 1992), Virginia (Murray and Wetzel, 1987;Hume et al, 2011), south Florida (Nagel, 2007;Yarbro and Carlson, 2008), and Australia (Eyre and Ferguson, 2002;Eyre et al, 2011b), but much higher than rates measured in H. beaudettei patches in the region (Stutes et al, 2007) (Table 2).…”
Section: -1419mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The dominant factor driving primary productivity in the seagrass beds was ambient light level (Fig. 3), with no indication of saturation of gross productivity, as has been observed with other aquatic macrophytes (Binzer et al, 2006;Rheuban et al, 2014). Productivity of seagrass beds in Big Lagoon was also comparable to that of prior studies that took place in Mississippi (Moncreiff et al, 1992), Virginia (Murray and Wetzel, 1987;Hume et al, 2011), south Florida (Nagel, 2007;Yarbro and Carlson, 2008), and Australia (Eyre and Ferguson, 2002;Eyre et al, 2011b), but much higher than rates measured in H. beaudettei patches in the region (Stutes et al, 2007) (Table 2).…”
Section: -1419mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Prior to incubations in the darkness, the water was vigorously stirred to reach oxygen saturation levels, whereas water was bubbled with nitrogen to get lower , and it was enhanced by using highly reflective aluminium foil at the shelves of the incubation chamber. This value is close to the mean irradiance saturation point for thallus pieces or phytoelements (250 µmol photons m -2 s -1 ; Binzer & Sand-Jensen 2006). Thus, it was also assumed to be saturating for the majority of the assayed species.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When shoot density is high, although the upper parts of the leaves may be light-saturated, the understory may not be saturated even at high light levels because of self-shading (Short 1980;Binzer et al 2006). Thus, ecosystem-scale measurements may be very different from P-I relationships determined by isolating a part of the plant such as a leaf segment (Binzer et al 2006;Sand-Jensen et al 2007). This non-saturating response was not evident in the 5 yr site, which instead showed a hyperbolic tangent relationship between photosynthesis and irradiance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rheuban et al (2014) found a strong correlation between rates of GPP and R with shoot density and attributed this relationship to several co-varying factors. GPP is influenced by shoot density directly through increased aboveground biomass and indirectly through increased efficiency of light absorption and thus photosynthesis with higher leaf area (Binzer et al 2006;Sand-Jensen et al 2007). Shoot density also influences respiration through increased belowground biomass or through indirect processes such as increased exudation of labile dissolved organic matter (Penhale and Smith 1977;Wetzel and Penhale 1979) and O 2 (Frederiksen and Glud 2006) from leaves, roots, and rhizomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation