Community perceptions of the impact of war on unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Protection of Civilian sites in Juba, South Sudan

Abstract

Conflict and mass displacement into Protection of Civilian (POCs) sites in South Sudan led to the breakdown of community and family structures, increasing women and girls' vulnerability to gender-based violence and exacerbating already poor sexual and reproductive health outcomes. As one component of a study on post-abortion care, this study explores community perceptions of unintended pregnancy and abortion in a POC in Juba. Four focus group discussions were conducted with 36 women and married men aged 18-45 living in the POC. Although initial reactions to induced abortion were generally negative, participants discussed that unintended pregnancy and induced abortion appeared to have increased during the current conflict. Their discussion of abortion became less condemnatory as they described changes in people's situation due to war, including instability and poverty, transactional sex, disruption of marital norms, rape, and low contraceptive use. This is one of the first studies to investigate community perceptions and practices related to unintended pregnancy and abortion in South Sudan. Despite the beliefs that these are taboo topics, the discussions provide an opening to reduce abortion stigma. To ensure lasting stigma reduction, investment in women and girls to improve gender equity is needed.

Abortion Experiences and Perspectives Amongst Migrants and Refugees: A Systematic Review

“…More broadly, much existing literature highlights the importance of social influences on SRH decision making and experiences among migrant and refugee communities, with migrant and refugee conceptions of SRH incorporating notions of social risk alongside more conventional biomedical risk [ 6 , 7 ]. This strengthened presence of social ties is similarly evident in the abortion attitudes among internally displaced people living in camps or settlements [ 57 , 58 ]. Likewise, in this review, social stigma, partner coercion and family pressure were important abortion decision-making factors.…”

High severity of abortion complications in fragile and conflict-affected settings: A cross-sectional study in two referral hospitals in Sub-Saharan Africa (AMoCo study)

“…The high severity of the complications in both study hospitals suggests that a significant number of women with severe complications may have undergone unsafe abortions. This is likely because access to SRH services including contraception and safe abortion care is very limited in fragile and conflict-affected contexts [73,74]. The low prevalence of modern contraception among women of reproductive age in Bangui (33% [34]) and in Jigawa state (4% [44]) with unmet needs of contraception at 31% in Bangui [34] and 15% in Jigawa State [44], support this hypothesis.…”

Exploring Access, Barriers, and Opportunities in Digital Health to Improve Sexual and Reproductive Health amongst Youths in Bamenda, Cameroon during Conflict: A Qualitative Study

“…Due to the profound and farreaching consequences of the context of con ict on the sexual and reproductive health of youths, the case of Bamenda needs to be looked at very closely [6-8]. In Juba, South Sudan, Casey et al describe how war has severely impacted women by signi cantly increasing the numbers of unwanted pregnancies and abortions [7].…”