2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community perception and prioritization of invasive alien plants in Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A global study roughly estimated that the total cost of IAPs to Nepal's agriculture was approximately US$ 1.4 billion per year (Paini et al, ). Local communities, who primarily rely on farming and forests for their livelihood and employment, have already been negatively impacted by IAPs, such as through increased labour input in weeding, reduced crop production, livestock poisoning, reduced supply of forage and negative impacts on forests (Shrestha, Shrestha et al, ). Future climate will increase the distribution of the IAPs that were ranked by local communities as the worst, such as Ageratum houstonianum , Chromolaena odorata , Ageratina adenophora and Mikania micrantha (Shrestha, Shrestha et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A global study roughly estimated that the total cost of IAPs to Nepal's agriculture was approximately US$ 1.4 billion per year (Paini et al, ). Local communities, who primarily rely on farming and forests for their livelihood and employment, have already been negatively impacted by IAPs, such as through increased labour input in weeding, reduced crop production, livestock poisoning, reduced supply of forage and negative impacts on forests (Shrestha, Shrestha et al, ). Future climate will increase the distribution of the IAPs that were ranked by local communities as the worst, such as Ageratum houstonianum , Chromolaena odorata , Ageratina adenophora and Mikania micrantha (Shrestha, Shrestha et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the modelled species ( Chromolaena odorata , Eichhornia crassipes , Lantana camara and Mikania micrantha ) are among the 100 of the world's worst invasive species (Lowe, Browne, Boudjelas, & DePoorter, ). Sixteen of the modelled species are considered highly problematic species by the local people of Nepal due to their negative impacts on agriculture, local livelihood and natural ecosystems (Shrestha, Shrestha et al, ). Modelled species were introduced either deliberately for ornamental purpose (e.g., L. camara , E. crassipes ) or accidentally (e.g., Ageratina adenophora , Parthenium hysterophorus ) to Nepal at various times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural control includes any non‐mechanical and non‐chemical practices that help to suppress the weed establishment, reproduction, dispersal and survival. In Nepal, people harvest A. adenophora and use it for cattle bedding and composting (Tiwari et al ., ; Baral et al ., ; Shrestha et al ., ). The biomass of this weed is also used for making bio‐briquettes (Baral et al ., ).…”
Section: Control and Managementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Health hazards of this weed to humans and other livestock have not been reported. Instead, rural communities in Nepal use leaf leachates of this plant to treat cuts and wounds (Shrestha et al ., ), implying an antiseptic effect.…”
Section: Impacts Of Invasionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation