2009
DOI: 10.1080/14623940802652730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community of practice for teachers: sensemaking or critical reflective learning?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These habits include: engaging in critical reflection on practice (Larivee, 2008;Smith, 2002); collaborating with peers (Clement & Vandenberghe, 2000;Ng & Tan, 2009); and seeking to deepen knowledge and strengthen skills (Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Kwang, 2001). It is agreed by these authors and others that desirable habits are the most effective when integrated into the daily school life of teachers (Robinson, 2003;Smardon & Charteris, 2012).…”
Section: Professional Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These habits include: engaging in critical reflection on practice (Larivee, 2008;Smith, 2002); collaborating with peers (Clement & Vandenberghe, 2000;Ng & Tan, 2009); and seeking to deepen knowledge and strengthen skills (Garet, Porter, Desimone, Birman, & Kwang, 2001). It is agreed by these authors and others that desirable habits are the most effective when integrated into the daily school life of teachers (Robinson, 2003;Smardon & Charteris, 2012).…”
Section: Professional Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, I have been able to follow themes of my own personal and professional interests and have also come to realise the vast range of new perspectives, initiatives and possibilities in teaching and learning that I might never have discovered. Being on study leave, without daily classroom needs dominating my attention, enabled me to generalise and broaden my perspective of not only my own practice but the nature of teaching itself, taking me beyond sensemaking into critically reflective learning (Ng & Tan, 2009). Clement and Vandenberghe (2000) compare and contrast the benefits of solitary and collegial forms of professional development.…”
Section: Collaboration In a Community Of Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ng and Tan's view that reflection within communities of practice can be as susceptible to the influence of managerialism as individual reflection is useful and support Brookfield's (1995:8) assertion that 'reflection is not, by definition, critical'. A key characteristic of critical reflective learning is that it requires one to move away from the immediate to take a broader view (Ng and Tan 2009). Doing so enables reflective practice to shift from problem-solving towards active collective reflection on the educational goals and values and issues of equity and social justice.…”
Section: Participatory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if I very often deliver the subjects by applying one-way teaching methods such as lectures, but, in another time I also tried to practice some active learning methods such as 'teaching starts with brainstorming and questions', 'small group discussions' and 'classroom debates'. It seems that my interactions with colleagues who have been quite advanced in practicing such active learning, have given me much more benefits, not only enhancing the possible quality of learning for students (Ng and Tan, 2009) but also 'collaborative dispositions' (Parkison, 2009) with my colleagues. Initially, I tended to imitate what they have practiced and gradually, I started making a little bit variation for my own teaching style.…”
Section: Afkarunamentioning
confidence: 99%