Community Health Worker Use of Smart Devices for Health Promotion: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background Community health workers (CHWs) have become essential to the promotion of healthy behaviors, yet their work is complicated by challenges both within and beyond their control. These challenges include resistance to the change of existing behaviors, disbelief of health messages, limited community health literacy, insufficient CHW communication skills and knowledge, lack of community interest and respect for CHWs, and CHWs’ lack of adequate supplies. The rising penetration of “smart” technology (eg, smartphones and tablets) in low- and middle-income countries facilitates the use of portable electronic devices in the field. Objective This scoping review examines to what extent mobile health in the form of smart devices may enhance the delivery of public health messages in CHW-client interactions, thereby addressing the aforementioned challenges and inducing client behavior change. Methods We conducted a structured search of the PubMed and LILACS databases using subject heading terms in 4 categories: technology user, technology device, use of technology, and outcome. Eligibility criteria included publication since January 2007, CHWs delivering a health message aided by a smart device, and face-to-face communication between CHWs and clients. Eligible studies were analyzed qualitatively using a modified version of the Partners in Health conceptual framework. Results We identified 12 eligible studies, 10 (83%) of which used qualitative or mixed methods approaches. We found that smart devices mitigate challenges encountered by CHWs by improving their knowledge, motivation, and creativity (eg, through self-made videos); their status within the community; and the credibility of their health messages. The technology stimulated interest in both CHWs and clients—and sometimes even in bystanders and neighbors. Media content produced locally or reflecting local customs was strongly embraced. Yet, the effect of smart devices on the quality of CHW-client interactions was inconclusive. Interactions suffered as CHWs were tempted to replace educational conversations with clients by passively watching video content. Furthermore, a series of technical difficulties experienced especially by older and less educated CHWs compromised some of the advantages brought about by mobile devices. Adequate CHW training ameliorated these difficulties. Only 1 study (8%) considered client health behavior change as an end point, thus revealing a major research gap. Conclusions Smart mobile devices may augment CHWs’ field performance and enhance face-to-face interactions with clients, yet they also generate new challenges. The available evidence is scarce, mostly qualitative, and focused on a limited range of health outcomes. Future research should include larger-scale interventions across a wide range of health outcomes and feature client health behavior change as an end point.

Experiences of community health workers on adopting mHealth in rural Malawi: A qualitative study

“…As reported in other studies, CHWs require time to adapt to mHealth due to the novelty of mHealth. 49 , 50 Based on this finding, mHealth implementers need to be aware of these early mHealth challenges and identify ways to address them as early as possible.…”

“…Due to the novelty of mHealth and poor digital literacy, CHWs require appropriate training in mHealth. 49 Lack of training in digital health has been reported as a barrier to mHealth. For example, CHWs felt more comfortable using mHealth to support pregnant women after receiving initial training, and refresher training was used to address challenges arising from time to time in a mHealth program in Mozambique.…”

The three-year evolution of Germany’s Digital Therapeutics reimbursement program and its path forward

“…Meanwhile, the DiGA program, with its ongoing revisions and updates, serves as a notable example of how DTx can be successfully integrated into a healthcare system that has historically been slow to adopt digitalization 40 . Indeed, the DiGA program's core principles are being replicated in other healthcare settings, most notably by France, which in 2023 introduced a comparable "Fast-Track" initiative for DTx and telemedicine applications, notably across all MDR risk classes 4 . Belgium, with a different reimbursement system, also introduced a 'Fast-Track' for DTx, There appears to be a discrepancy between DiGA pricing and their clinical benefits, indicating that the actual success of a DiGA is not adequately reflected in its cost.…”

“…The German DiGA program as a nationwide example of a regulated Digital Therapeutics reimbursement pathway Digital Therapeutics (DTx), usually regulated as Software as a Medical Device 1 , are evidence-based digital products which by treating a "disease, disorder, condition, or injury" aim to have "demonstrable positive therapeutic impacts on patient health" 2 . While the concept of leveraging digital solutions for extending the reach of medical practitioners dates back to at least the 1990s 3 , healthcare systems worldwide continue to explore effective integration methods for these innovations 4,5 .…”

Public health nursing: Challenges and innovations for health literacy in rural area

“…Therefore, health literacy can be seen as a disadvantage because there is a risk factor or lack of knowledge about health in the community. On the other hand, health literacy can be seen as empowering individuals, communities, and governments to have greater control over their health and various social and environmental determinants of health in the community (Greuel et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2020). Both perspectives play an important role in assessing the health status of rural areas and determining the next steps.…”