2023
DOI: 10.1177/10901981231179498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Health Worker Interventions for Men: A Scoping Review Using the RE-AIM Framework

Abstract: Introduction Community health workers (CHWs) are health promotion specialists who are trusted members of the community served and have a close understanding of the community’s needs and values. CHWs are a cost-effective and scalable workforce to promote health among men through tailored approaches. The purpose of the present review was to use the RE-AIM Framework to assess design, implementation, and outcomes of CHW-implemented health promotion efforts tailored for men to provide recommendations for future eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RE-AIM has been used to evaluate programs and setting in public health and community settings and is thought to be particularly useful when evaluate interventions in “real-world” settings ( 40 , 41 ). It has also been used to evaluate public health interventions which make use of community health workers in community-based setting ( 42 44 ). Results are made up of quantitative measures from the participant questionnaires, qualitative interviews with the participants, the CHWs, VCSE partners, and the research team.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RE-AIM has been used to evaluate programs and setting in public health and community settings and is thought to be particularly useful when evaluate interventions in “real-world” settings ( 40 , 41 ). It has also been used to evaluate public health interventions which make use of community health workers in community-based setting ( 42 44 ). Results are made up of quantitative measures from the participant questionnaires, qualitative interviews with the participants, the CHWs, VCSE partners, and the research team.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%